Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2008 <br /> <br /> <br />any names, but it was not Chuck Leone, or Kathy or Leo. He stated that they worked <br />together well, quite frankly the most cordial and accomplished bargaining sessions in <br />many years, twenty (20) that he could remember, through a proverbial tennis match of <br />ideas and thoughts, they came to a tentative agreement, the one that is before the Council <br />tonight. One that the FOP passed by a majority ballot. Mr. Ruszkowski stated that they <br />are in very trying times to say the least and they as police officers feel as much of the <br />pinch if not more than anyone else. The issue is that they have been feeling that pinch for <br />many, many years and unfortunately this year and 2009 will be no different. He stated <br />that he hoped that someday they will be placed on the scale where they should be if not <br />for any other reason let it be because they have earned it. Despite the constant dangers at <br />any minute that the officers remain diligent and professional and are recognized <br />throughout the state as a top notch police department. He stated that they are ranked in <br />the 60’s out of 143 municipalities. Mr. Ruszkowski advised that they are still nowhere <br />near the fourth largest city in the state category that they have held for many years. <br />Nearly eighteen years ago, then Mayor Kernan stated “Officer’s tighten your belts, step <br />up to the plate” once COIT and CEDIT kick in you’ll be where you should be. Well they <br />cannot tighten their belts any further and they are still at the plate waiting for a pitch. <br />There never seems to be a good time to give the officer’s a raise that would place them in <br />th <br />the number 4 spot. Unfortunately, we all know that 2009 isn’t the best time either and <br />have sadly accepted that fact. On a high note however, they will continue to do what <br />ever they can with ideas and actions to help the department and the City of South Bend to <br />move forward and pass this most recent setback that we all know as HB1001. He stated <br />that the FOP appreciates all the time and effort that the Council, Mayor, Board of Safety <br />has put forth and hope to continue the correspondence and talks through labor <br />management sessions and would like to specifically invite Councilmember White <br />because they do miss her input at those sessions. He stated that they look forward to <br />sitting down again in 2009 to discussion a future contract, wage and benefits proposals <br />and hope that the Council and Administration feel the same. <br /> <br />Councilmember Varner asked Mr. Ruszkowski in his experience was he aware and <br />supportive of the elimination of the Safe Neighborhood Program. <br /> <br />Mr. Ruszkowski stated that it is a “Catch 22” situation. Without putting the cart before <br />the horse, he has a family that he has to worry about. The priority at that time and this <br />time is the family. Which he is not speaking for every officer in the FOP capacity, but <br />personally, he lives outside of the city limits not very far, but is one of the reasons that he <br />moved out of the city. There were a variety of reasons, one there was a very low number <br />of officers receiving the safe neighborhood stipend, because the boundaries were so tight <br />there were officers literally living across the street from each other and one was outside <br />the boundaries and not able to receive the stipend. That was one of the contributing <br />factors to the elimination of the program. He stated that some of the officers were upset <br />about the elimination and rightfully so, however, the majority of the officers said, hey, we <br />are willing to give that up, as long as everyone can get a “slice of the pie” so to speak. <br />That is how it was determined to put that $200 toward the uniform allowance, per officer. <br /> <br />Councilmember Varner asked Mr. Ruszkowski how does the idea strike him of an <br />incentive to keep police officers or to encourage them to reside within the City? He <br />stated that Mr. Ruszkowski could speak personally or as a representative of the FOP #36. <br /> <br />Mr. Ruszkowski stated that he could probably speak for both. He advised that every <br />police officer would not do this job if they did not have the heart to be here. He is just <br />saying from the prospective, it does not matter if it is a police officer or himself <br />personally, just like everyone else in this room they have a family to think about. They <br />are doing everything that they can why there are there, and believe him, it’s not just 9-5 <br />punch in and punch out. It is never, ever, for any officer from the Chief all the way to the <br />newest hire. He stated that they give what they can when they can and how they can <br />when they are doing the job. The problem is when do you draw the line? When do you <br />say, I’m putting the gun and badge away, I am now a Dad, I am now a Mom, or whatever <br />the case maybe. Mr. Ruszkowski stated that personally that it is the decision to move <br />out. He advised that when this program was in effect he missed the residency cut-off by <br />not more than half a block. He stated that wasn’t the point, it wasn’t a money luring <br />thing, but he thinks that there are a variety of options on the table so to speak and could <br /> 7 <br /> <br />