Laserfiche WebLink
Erie Insurance Group <br />April 22, 2025 <br />Page 6 <br /> <br /> <br />the effects of . Evidence was found during the site inspection that <br />the forces from the impact damaged individual structural framing members of the <br />roof structure at the southwest corner of the second story. The forces from the <br />tree impact damaged the decking and rafter extensions of the southwest hip ridge <br />and the south- and west-facing roof slopes, broke the fascia boards, separated the <br />wood overhangs, and detached a decorative wood cornice piece. The tree impact <br />fractured the decking of the west-facing roof slope above the master bathroom and <br />detached the gutter from the west eave. We noted no fractured wood framing of <br />the first story rafters above the master bathroom, and no indication of fractured <br />ceiling joists were noted across the first and second story ceilings. In the family <br />room, master bedroom, staircase, second story hallway, the living room, second <br />story bedrooms, and the main level hallway, we noted no recent wall and ceiling <br />cracks at locations of openings in the walls, at interior door openings, or at the <br />intersection of walls. Individual plaster cracks were noted on the walls of the <br />master bedroom and first level hallway that were covered with paint and did not <br />have the appearances of being from a recent event. We noted no wallboard cracks <br />at the lower-level staircase or the building corners to indicate racking and twisting <br />of the building in its entirety. The wood framing of the garage s roof structure <br />sustained widespread and significant damage necessitating the removal and <br />replacement of the rafters, ridge beam, decking, and asphalt composition shingles. <br /> <br />Mr. Alexander Horvath believes damage occurred to the wood framing of the <br />building, the interior wallboard and plaster finishes, the roof slopes, possibly <br />racking of the entire building, and potential damage to the foundation and attached <br />garage. <br /> <br /> <br />ANALYSIS <br />When a tree strikes a building, a transfer of energy takes place between the tree <br />and the structure it strikes. The rules of physics are such that the softer the <br />material being struck, the greater amount of the tree's total energy is transferred <br />into the object being struck, and therefore the greater potential damage to that <br />object. In addition, the greater the velocity of the moving object, the greater the <br />energy available to be imparted into the receiving structure. A building and <br />attached components generally have large masses and require being struck by <br />another object of sufficient kinetic energy to break and fracture the individual <br />building components. The tree had sufficient mass to damage the building in <br />localized and specific areas, and the physical evidence observed at the property <br />indicated that the tree was moving at a low speed resulting in damage to hip rafter <br />end at the second story roof slope, the west and east-facing roof slopes at the <br />attached garage, fractured the ridge beam at the garage, gouged the shingles of <br />the west roof slopes, displaced the walls in the attached garage, fractured rafters <br />at the , and to resulted in wallboard cracks in the <br />master bathroom and kitchen ceiling.