Laserfiche WebLink
Erie Insurance Group <br />April 22, 2025 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br /> <br />of the tree impact. The cracks in the stone lintel and mortar joints of the west wall <br />were filled with accumulated dirt and debris, did not have the appearance of being <br />recently formed, and no stone lintel pieces were noted on the ground and at the <br />basement window. <br />We observed no evidence around the building exterior to indicate racking of the <br />residential building, specifically in the corners of the house, or evidence of <br />movement and shifting of the roof structure toward the north and east associated <br />with the tree impacts or high wind forces. We noted the entry doors in the east <br />and south walls of the residential building were not binding in their frames, and the <br />windows of the building opened and closed without dragging and without being <br />forced. The interior doors were noted to open and close without rubbing and were <br />not bound in their frames. The windows around the perimeter of the building did <br />not contain fractured or broken glass panes, the window frames were not <br />damaged, and the windows opened and closed when operated. The exterior walls <br />contained no fractured bricks from tree limb impacts. The tree and tree limbs <br />impacted the second story roof slope, the first story west-facing roof slope above <br />the master bathroom, and the west-facing roof slope and west eave of the attached <br />garage. At the attached garage, widespread evidence of racking, twisting, and <br />leaning of the garage in its entirety was noted at the southwest and southeast <br />corners. <br />, <br />and the measurements taken indicated that the north, west, east, and south <br />exterior walls of the house were plumb in the locations measured. No cracks and <br />separations were noted in the south, east, and north exterior wall finishes to <br />indicate northward and eastward movements in the tops of the exterior <br />walls associated with tree impact. The lathe and plaster, and gypsum wallboard <br />throughout the building interior, specifically the wallboard and plaster on walls <br />parallel to the tree impact or installed in the east-west plane, did not contain cracks <br />or separations above door and window openings to indicate movement of the <br />structure toward the east, except for the west wall and north interior wall at the <br />master bathroom. We observed hairline wallboard cracks in the ceilings of the <br />master bathroom and kitchen associated with elastic deformation in the wood <br />framing of the building resulting from the tree impact. The hairline ceiling cracks <br />were in line with the tree impacting the west eave of the first story, and the cracks <br />were noted in the tape seams of the wallboard. We did not note broken <br />windowpanes in the south- and west-facing windows, or damage to the entry <br />doors. The floor <br />observed to the humped or sloped to indicate displacements in the floor structure, <br />perimeter foundation walls, or interior support posts and beams. The tops of the <br />south, east, and west exterior CMU walls of the attached garage were displaced <br />toward the east from the tree impact at the west eave and west-facing roof slope <br />of the garage. <br /> <br />The roof structure revealed indications of distress and movement consistent with