Laserfiche WebLink
Erie Insurance Group <br />April 22, 2025 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br /> <br />entry porch. <br />At our site inspection, portions of the tree and tree limbs were removed from the <br />house and garage, portions of the large mature tree remained in the west yard, <br />some tree limb debris was at the site and along the roof slopes, and a tarpaulin <br />covered portions of the south- and west-facing roof slopes at the second story. <br />During the course of our site visit, we noted isolated damage to the asphalt <br />composition shingles at the second story, and the first story roof slopes of the <br />house and attached garage, detached soffit boards at the south and west second <br />story overhangs, partially detached gutters at the west eaves, and a detached <br />wood decorative cornice from the south overhang. The tree limbs did not impact <br />the walls, windows, roof slopes, or roof covering at the turret. Cracks and <br />separations were present in the west, south, and east CMU walls of the attached <br />garage. A long horizontal crack was present across the west garage wall at its <br />mid-height, stair-stepped cracks were present at the southeast and southwest <br />corners of the garage, the top of the south garage wall was displaced toward the <br />south approximately 3 inches, and the top of the east wall of the garage was <br />displaced toward the east 2 feet at the northeast corner. The concrete slab <br />foundation of the garage did not contain recent cracks or separations consistent <br />with the tree impact. We noted no cracks or separations in the mortar joints of the <br />stone foundation from the tree impact. The stone basement window lintel at the <br />west side of the building was cracked through its thickness, the exposed crack <br />edges were worn and weathered, and the progressive fractures of the stone was <br />evidence of long-term movement and cracks in the lintel. No pieces of fractured <br />stone from the lintel were noted on the ground and adjacent to the window. We <br />noted the mortar joint at the top of the window lintel was separated, the south side <br />of the window opening contained mortar joint repairs at the west foundation wall, <br />and the movement, cracks, and displacement in the west stone foundation wall <br />and window lintel did not have the appearances of recent damage. We noted no <br />damage to the master bathroom window in the west exterior wall above the <br />basement window lintel, and no cracks in the brick between the windows to <br />indicate vertical forces transferred down the west wall to fracture the stone lintel. <br />We noted no cracks and separations in the bricks of the south, north, east, and <br />west exterior walls for the house, no stair-stepped cracks or separation in the <br />corners of the residential building, and no leaning or displacements in the exterior <br />walls of the house to indicate shifting, racking, or general leaning of the building in <br />its entirety due to the tree impact. The top of the southern patio post at the east <br />side of the house and at the east entry door was leaning toward the east <br />approximately 1 inch. We noted the 4 inches by 4 inches posts were enclosed <br />with 1 inch thick wood members to form a 6 inches by 6 inches posts. The top of <br />the southernmost 4 inches by 4 inches posts was exposed, the wood post was <br />twisted at the top, and the exposed wood at the 4 inches by 4 inches post was <br />covered with white paint. The displacements in the porch posts were unrelated to <br />the tree impact. No recent cracks or separations were noted in the stone <br />foundation walls and mortar joints to indicate recent movement occurred as a result