03-14-05 Zoning & Annexation - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I . Commission. It was believed that the 51%process would"short-circuit neighborhood input". It was believed that having the process initiated by the District Council Member would be the "most informative and would have the most information collected". A proposed set of standards were developed which was a process over 1 1/2 years. The Chapin Board met the 3rd Wednesday of each month and minutes were posted at ChapinPark.org. In response to a question from Dr. Varner,Mr. Hodgson stated that two (2) adults per household could vote. He noted in response to a question from Council Member Rouse that Madison Street is within the proposed district. Council Member Kuspa then asked persons who were in favor of Substitute Bill No. 67-04 to make brief remarks. Todd Zeiger of Historic Landmarks of Indiana noted that in 1997 a study of five(5)communities was conducted in Indiana which included Anderson, Vincennes and Indianapolis. The survey showed that local districts provide protection,enhance values, and promote stability. Bob Yapp of 729 Cottage Grove noted that over 150 homes would be affected. He stated that he is a property rights advocate. He stated that not to allow the creation of the local historic district would be discrimination against the central city neighbors. He further stated that such a designation is not a taking of property rights. He added that since the City of South Bend does not have rental inspections that such a designation would stop"bad fill-in housing". Council Member Kuspa noted that any one else wishing to speak in favor could speak at the meeting this evening. He then called for anyone who wished to make brief statements in opposition to Substitute Bill No. 67-04. Margaret Porter of 917 Leland noted that she sent letter to each of the Council Members expressing her reasons of opposition. She noted that Leland has a "preponderance of rental properties"and they would not be able to be torn down. She suggested that the real effect should be where there are truly significant structures. She expressed concern over the inclusiveness of the survey and would welcome a more open process. She asked that the Bill be tabled. Dan Slatery of 754 Leland voiced concern about the notice which was used in the process. He stated that he is "alarmed by the restrictions", noting that the document was amended before the last Historic Preservation Commission. He noted that the Commission did meet with residents but believes the survey was flawed. Council Member Kuspa stated that any further comments from the public would have to be made this evening. Council Member Rouse spoke in opposition to Substitute Bill No. 67-04. Council Member Dieter then made a motion, seconded by Council Member Kirsits that Substitute Bill No. 67-04 be recommended favorably to Council. Council President Pfeifer expressed concern with regard to timing and noted that she would be in favor of continuing the Bill and asked Mr. Livingston whether this was possible. March 14,2005 Zoning and Annexation Committee of the 2005 South Bend Common Council -page 2-