My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
April 2003
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes and Recordings
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2003
>
April 2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:15 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:10:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001360
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MARY JANE CHASE: Asked a question about the finish. <br />SCOTT PEACOCK: They will be baked -on tan enamel to match the rest of the house. <br />JOANN SPORLEDER: I did do some research this afternoon. If the primary reason for <br />replacing these windows; is in fact, the lead paint. According to the research that I <br />managed to do, there are ways of possibly encapsulating the lead paint by applying new <br />current types of paint. This would then keep the lead paint in place and present no hazard <br />to it. <br />However, there are certain other kinds of circumstances that might apply. If the house <br />is going to be used by small children under federally funded programs for instance, then <br />the removal of lead paint would be mandated by HUD and other agencies. <br />However, in residential areas it is not quite clear whether those kinds of standards also <br />apply, and to what extent then the lead paint could in' fact be encapsulated by the new <br />current types of paint. <br />So, I would like to suggest that at this time if this is the primary reason for replacing <br />the windows that we do some further research into the absolute requirements and see if <br />there is some other way of handling this before they move on and remove the windows. <br />CATHERINE HOSTETLER: Mr. Hall did you want to address that question, or staff? <br />MELVIN HALL: I think the question that was asked was the primary reason for redoing <br />the windows. I don't know how I would define primary and secondary; because, there <br />are at least three reasons: <br />1. The lead paint on the windows <br />2. The windows are not energy efficient <br />3. The windows are not in good working condition <br />JOHN OXIAN: When you say that the windows don't work, are they painted shut? <br />MELVIN HALL: Yes, some of the windows have been painted shut. I believe, Scott, <br />can better inform'you as to the current condition and working order of the windows. <br />SCOTT PEACOCK: The current sashes are coming apart. A lot of the weight <br />mechanisms are not operable anymore. On some of the sashes, the emollients between <br />the glasses are loose. There are a multitude of reasons for having the old windows <br />removed. <br />JOHN OXIAN: Are these the windows with the steel weights in them? <br />SCOTT PEACOCK: Yes they are. <br />JOHN OXIAN: So, do you take the steel weights out if you remove these windows? <br />SCOTT PEACOCK: Yes we do. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.