Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />transom or.sidelights. He feels that it's a significant impact on the look of <br />the house. Mr. Fine suggested trying to retain all the front windows. Mr. <br />Oxian asked how bad the front windows were. Mr. Hojnacki stated that they <br />were just as bad the rest of the windows in the house. He further stated that <br />the only ones in really good shape were the living room windows. Mr. Oxian <br />questioned if there was a way to have a new window made that would better <br />match the existing front window. Mr. Hojnacki stated that it would not be <br />economically feasible to do so. Mr. Duvall noted that the closest window <br />design the manufacturer makes had fixed sashes across the top but it still did <br />not look like the existing pattern and was double the cost. Mr. Fine <br />reiterated that in steel* casement windows the muntin or the divided lights <br />were very prominent features of the windows. Mrs. Sporleder noted that with <br />the.sandwiched muntin you get a plain sheet of glass on the outside that dulls <br />the presence of the interior muntins. Mrs. Sporleder stated that the <br />commission needed to look at the standards, what the standards say and how the <br />neighborhood expects the cojmission to up hold them. Mr. Wiener noted that <br />the whole issue of whether Mr. Hojnacki had followed the guidelines or not <br />centered around the definition of the word "similar". Mrs. Hostetler agreed <br />with Mr. Fine in that when the light hits the new windows all you are going to <br />be able to see is one sheet of glass, the muntins will not be visible. Mr. <br />Oxian noted that the commission has allowed other applicants to do similar <br />window replacements in the pasta Mr. Fine restated that muntins should always <br />be on the outside. Mr. Oxian stated that in his opinion it sounded like <br />everyone was okay with the replacement of the side and rear windows and that <br />the only problem is with the replacement of the front window. <br />Mrs. Hostetler asked if the applicant had already paid for the windows and if <br />he was ready to put them in.- Mr. Hojnacki responded that he had. <br />'Mr. Fine questioned if the front study window ever had an air conditioning <br />unit it. Mr. Hojnacki responded that it did not. Mr. Fine stated that the <br />window could then have an interior storm window installed to provide the <br />needed efficiency. There was some discussion over the windows protruding <br />hardware and the depth of the sill. Mr. Oxian stated that Mr. Fine wanted the <br />window to be retained. Mr. Hojnacki said that would not happen because then <br />that window would be different from the rest of the windows. Mrs. Sporleder <br />mentioned that she was not convinced that interior storm windows were an <br />impossibility. Mrs. Petrass noted that you can get interior storm windows to <br />fit over the cranks. <br />Mr. Fine stated that he was just trying to come up with a compromise in which <br />both parties are happy. He suggested that the front windows be left, because <br />of their visibility from the street and that the side and rear windows can be <br />replaced. Mr. Fine felt that the steel casement windows that were to be left <br />untouched would clash with the new flat pane windows. <br />Mrs. Sporleder again showed concern that the standards be up -held the way the <br />neighborhood would want them to be. She stated that the proposal seems to <br />follow the standards as one could interpret them. Mr. Hojnacki noted that he <br />had gone to extra expense and effort to get wipdows that conformed to the <br />standards as he had interpreted them. <br />Mrs. Hostetler expressed confusion as to why Mr. Hojnacki put out all that <br />money for a major project with out consulting the commission first. Mr. <br />Hojnacki stated that he had applied when he had the opportunity to do so. He <br />felt that there would not be any controversy over his project. He also <br />reiterated that .it was a question of the word "similar" and he felt that he <br />had achieved this goal. Jerry Wiener moved to approve the application as <br />presented. Joann Sporleder seconded the motion. Mr. Oxian suggested that the <br />front window be saved for future owners. The motion passed as amended with <br />three in favor, Jerry Wiener, Joann Sporleder and Janeanne Petrass. Those <br />opposed were Adrian Fine and Catherine Hostetler. John Oxian abstained. <br />