My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
January 1991
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 1991
>
January 1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:15 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:07:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001359
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Nothing shall be done to change the essential character <br />of the roof as viewed from the thoroughfare by adding <br />architectural features, large, unsightly fixtures, or <br />by using roofing materials inappropriate to the style <br />of the house. <br />C. Windows and Doors <br />1) Required <br />Original windows and doors, including sash, lintels, <br />sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, <br />and hardware shall be retained or when deteriorated <br />beyond repair, replaced with units and trim resembling <br />the original. <br />2) Recommended <br />Wood frame storm windows and doors, painted to match <br />the existing or original, should be used but should not <br />damage existing frames. If new sash and doors are <br />used, the existing or original materials, design, and <br />hewn,-A-hou_ld_b,-- w::�PH_ when metal storm windows and <br />doors are used they should be painted, anodized or <br />coated to match the existing. <br />3 ) Prohibited <br />Original windows, doors, and hardware shall not be <br />discarded when they can be restored and reused in <br />place. New windows or door openings that would alter <br />the scale and proportion of the building may not be <br />introduced. Inappropriate new window or door features <br />such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that <br />require the removal of original windows and doors may <br />not be installed. <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br />Part I.) The proposal for re -roofing is an in-kind replacement <br />and is a staff approval item. <br />Part IA.) Ridge vents as per the submitted specification are <br />sympathetic to the building's aesthetic character. <br />Part IB.) The chimney does not appear to be in need of repair <br />from street level. It should be tuck pointed only if a closer <br />examination does yield/has yielded deterioration. Any repointing <br />should not done with a mortar of high Portland cement content. <br />Part II.) The standards prohibit the alteration of "the <br />essential character of the roof as viewed from the thoroughfare. <br />The proposed dormers, however, are sympathetic to existing <br />materials and building style, and thus minimally compromise the <br />building's aesthetic integrity. From the standpoint of historic <br />integrity, the building, heavily altered to date, may benefit <br />from the addition of stylistically correct dormers. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.