Laserfiche WebLink
Part III & IIIA.) That portion of the rear elevation subject to <br />change as per the submitted plans is a non -historic addition. <br />Proposed changes are, in general, appropriate. The staff <br />recommends that the Commission discuss the appropriateness of the <br />proposed Palladian -type window as this will considerably alter <br />the character of the rear facade. <br />Part IV.) A site inspection revealed that the sash in front <br />facade (north) is in good condition and the sash in the east <br />facade is in poor to fair condition. Most of the structure's <br />openings have been refitted with Eagle brand replacements. <br />The owner is not ready to execute Part IV of the proposed <br />alteration schedule, but wishes to carry out the procedure at a <br />later date. The staff proposes that approval for the above be <br />granted pending the submission of the appropriate specifications <br />prior to the commencement of work so that the staff may assure <br />that the replacement sashes resemble the originals as per the <br />standards. <br />