My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-14-16
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Common Council Meeting Minutes
>
2016
>
11-14-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2017 10:36:19 AM
Creation date
12/13/2016 11:12:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Council Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
11/14/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REGULAR MEETING <br />NOVEMBER 14, 2016 <br />Marry Rose Eslinger, 307 East LaSalle Avenue, stated she lives at The Point and has done so for <br />twelve (12) years. She stated she has lived there longer than Mr. Mathews has been out of <br />school. She stated she knows this neighborhood and is in opposition to the entire project even <br />though she loves Martins. She stated she just does not want to see a grocery store across the <br />street. Her quality of life will suffer because she will be in the dark and her AEP bills will be <br />sky -high due to her lights being on all day. This is a good project but he should do something <br />like the East Bank Townhomes not this building. This is incongruous with a village. The traffic <br />will be deplorable. She stated she knows what she is talking about and this is a wrong idea for <br />this block. Apartment buildings should be against the river or on the East Race and should be <br />away from everything. We haven't had a Martins for a long time or grocery store at all but <br />maybe we should do a satellite Target or something. Villages can have a two (2) level <br />department store. She stated she has six (6) opportunities to buy groceries where she lives and <br />she shops local. Let's put the Martins on the west side of the river and build reasonable <br />apartments. She stated she is for growth and development but not on her block. <br />Mr. Mathews was given five (5) minute for rebuttal. He stated he will try to address as many <br />concerns as he can in the time. He stated the owner of The Pointe apartments stated they are <br />okay with nine (9) stories and that the taxpayers are putting in more money than Mathews LLC <br />because the taxpayers are doing a tax abatement. Mr. Mathews stated that is ridiculous. The <br />regional cities grant is ten percent (10 %) of cost. The down payment that he needs to put up to <br />the lender is his own money not the taxpayers and the loan he receives from the bank is <br />guaranteed by him. The bank will get paid unless he has no money. It is certainly his risk even if <br />he has a bank loan. Mr. Mathews stated the owner of The Pointe stated he is not concerned about <br />competition but then brought up concerns about demand which shows that really they do have a <br />concern about competition. If they can get three (3) stories knocked off the building it is seventy - <br />four units fewer. If they can get a grocery store across the street with no apartments above, that is <br />the best case for the other developers. Mr. Mathews stated he believes he knows what it will cost <br />to build this building and he has more experience building condos and housing, like the pictures <br />he has shown, because he actually built them. <br />Mr. Mathews continued that people are asking for the Council to take their time but we have <br />been working on this for six (6) months. We have had multiple public meetings, staff reports, <br />Community Investment supports this proposal, and the Area Plan Commission moved this on <br />neutrally. Now it is up for the Council to make a decision. We are not asking the City for any <br />money in this proposal and this proposal works. We could do it shorter, if we had some support. <br />The East Bank Plan called for millions of dollars to be invested over the past eight (8) years <br />which didn't happen. We had the Jefferson Street and Niles Avenue improvements but the two <br />(2) parking garages the City was supposed to build have not materialized. We have heard from <br />other developers who were the same people who first changed the height limit. <br />Mr. Mathews finished by stating this projects fits within the character of the neighborhood. It is <br />taller but the character and style and design of the building has much more impact on the <br />character of the street than the height. We could build a one (1) story strip mall with a parking <br />structure on the corner which would be completely fine with the East Bank Plan but it would not <br />fit the character of the neighborhood. <br />Chairperson Ferlic stated because we limited the Councilmembers to two (2) questions earlier, <br />we now will have an opportunity for any final questions after hearing public input. <br />Councilmember Williams- Preston asked Mr. Mathews why they did not look into changing the <br />East Bank Plan back in June when the Area Plan Commission recommended them to. <br />Mr. Mathews responded that we had some conversation both with Community Investment and <br />some City Councilmembers. To change the plan is a very involved process. First you have to <br />change the plan, then you have to change the zoning ordinance. The total process would take six <br />(6) months to a year. Once that plan is updated we then have to change the zoning ordinance to <br />comply with the plan. That is probably another two (2) to three (3) months. That puts us well <br />over a year to get this changed. If you look at the precedents that have been set, the ABZA <br />changed the height from sixty (60) feet to ninety -eight (98) feet which is a sixty eight percent <br />(68 %) increase immediately. We are asking for a seventy -eight percent (78 %) increase over that. <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.