Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 14, 2016 <br />It does not seem unreasonable to come to the City Council and ask for a public meeting, have <br />public input and hear from the neighbors on this issue. We have had fifty (50) some letters of <br />public support, mostly from people living in the neighborhood. Of the people who spoke against <br />the project today, one (1) person lives in the immediate neighborhood, one (1) person lives a <br />block off of Eddy Street, and everybody else either lives out of state or not in this neighborhood. <br />This project has a lot of community support and from the neighborhood organization of the area. <br />It also has support of the business owners and leaders of downtown. Going through the process <br />of asking the Council made the most sense and it gave the Council more control than if we just <br />changed the height limit. We need a path that developers can go through and the PUD is a great <br />path because we have to say what we have to do and provide a site plan. There are a lot of <br />commitments we had to make in the application process which binds our project to what we said <br />we were going to do. If the limit is just blanket raised, the City Council and community loses that <br />control. That is why this was the right path. <br />Chairperson Ferlic stated that each Councilmember will have an opportunity to speak and then a <br />motion will be entertained. <br />Councilmember Williams- Preston thanked everyone for sticking around so late into the night and <br />sharing their thoughts. She. stated she has not spoken to a person on the Council that is against <br />the development but what we know is we have to take the time to make sure the process is <br />handled in the expectation of the law. We do need to shepherd this growth in the right way. It is <br />also important to honor the decisions of people made before us. There are laws that are guiding <br />this process and we do have things we have to abide by. She stated Mr. Mathews is brilliant and <br />kind and has demonstrated his commitment to our community, there is no denying that. One (1) <br />thing that people didn't say though is that he is also very tough and we are scrutinizing his <br />project because it is our job and he can take it. This process is important to make sure we get this <br />right. <br />This issue of the young professionals is interesting and it is important we did hear from some <br />who buck the trend a bit. She thanked the teacher who came because she sees a lot of Millennials <br />who may not afford this development. We have to make sure we don't rush into something <br />because there are people in her neighborhood who are not seeing this growth or see themselves <br />in these plans. Something that feels like it is low income is not necessarily affordable. We have <br />to have more conversations as a community to demonstrate what true affordable housing is. She <br />stated she will stop talking about this issue when the developers start talking about this issue. She <br />stated she is not sure tonight has been a true representation of everybody and the people she is <br />supposed to represent. Young Millennials have stated they want a diverse community in terms of <br />race, education, income, and thought. It is important that while we do this amazing development <br />that we are also paying attention that we have a space for the people who live here now and the <br />majority of whom would not be able to live in those. spaces. We want to see this amazing <br />revitalization, which is happening in other cities, but we need to do it in an equitable fashion. <br />Hand in hand with these great developments we need to make sure we come up with some <br />practical measures to keep that in mind. Gentrification is real and it will happen if we don't pay <br />attention but we can have revitalization without displacement. Let's make that commitment <br />together. <br />Councilmember Randy Kelly stated the 2008 East Bank Master Plan is a very good plan and he <br />knows a number of the people who worked on it. He stated it is a guide to our future. The plan <br />called for about $90 million in private investment by 2016. We have not gotten there at this <br />point. It also called for a technology and medical corridor to St. Joseph Regional Medical Center <br />which would be a very long corridor now as they moved to Mishawaka. The plan can morph and <br />change with changing times. To that end, the viability of this project will be born out in whether <br />it can get financed and the details to come. He stated he supports this proposal. <br />Councilmember Jo M. Broden stated in many ways this has not been a big enough process. We <br />have to get it right and make sure the how matches the outcome. Impulsing developers and doing <br />research with urban planners in our City, to create unique and viable spaces. There is not a single <br />Councilmember here, who do not want any of the same goals that the remonstrators spoke for <br />nor the folks who spoke in support. We want individuals in houses. We want individuals <br />stopping by cafes, restaurants, and frequenting our parks. Despite that, we have to get it right and <br />24 <br />