11-14-16 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 14, 2016 vision. However when she discovered the extreme height that is when she became opposed to the project. She stated she is in favor of the project but not at that height. We need to revisit the East Bank plan but putting that sized building at that site is not the right thing to do. Amaliza Blocke, 2015 East Madison Street South Bend, stated she came with opinions but has developed some new thoughts. The East Bank Village is a great idea and its something she looks forward to. It is nice to have something quaint and small and have things to do. She stated apparently she is the abnormal millennial. The idea that we are going to put in this beautiful expensive building is not really what she wants for this neighborhood. She stated she teaches at Adams High School and this is not what is best for them because they will eventually pay this cost. There are a lot of young people who cannot afford this. Tom Panzica, with Panzika Building Corp. at 416 East Monroe Street, stated he is an investor in the property called the Wharf at Colfax and the river which is across from this property. He stated he is not against development or a grocery store downtown. The question we are considering is essentially is this development right for this neighborhood at this time. There have been some specious arguments made in support of that argument tonight. We have been told this project must be twelve (12) stories and an all or nothing deal. That is false. We were told we need to dispense with the 2008 plan because Mr. Mathews is planning thirty (30) years out. However, that plan was put together with input from the community and at the cost of $50,000 to the City. It is a good plan which some developers are following. We have also been told that Mr. Mathews' development will build community and a sense of new urbanism but this plan in this place tramples on the 2008 plan that the community adopted. We have also been told that this proposal would be welcomed with. open arms in more enlightened cities such as Indianapolis. He stated Indianapolis has a neighborhood very analogous to the East Bank Village, which is named Broadripple, and they only have a sixty -five (65) foot height in their zoning. We have also been told that the BZA has established a precedent which was allowed to the Wharf site. That is an incongruous argument. Finally, this project should be of concern because nobody who has been involved in this project, while they have talent and nice degrees, does not have a registered licensed architect who passed the State of Indiana Board Examination. That is concerning with such a large project. This would be a great project across the river and an OK project if you lower the height. Hannah Osteimer, 1009 East Jefferson Blvd., stated she is a millennial as well and everyone has been saying what we need as a demographic. She stated she needs something she can afford. Two hundred and forty (240) apartments would be awesome but she would not be able to afford that. The townhomes Mr. Mathews built sell for $800,000 and it is hard to see a twelve (12) story building in a village. It is great that Mr. Mathews is committed to our neighborhood but it is just too big. People who are working who don't make very much money don't have sixteen (16) hours a month to volunteer. She stated she is in support of a development just not this one. Frank Perri, 234 South Coquillard, stated he finds himself fairly responsible for the shaken bushes tonight amongst the community. Some developers feel speaking in front of the City may conflict with their business dealings with the City but they all believe the character of the East Bank and the plan should be kept in place. This development violates almost every standard that has been set in the neighborhood. Mr. Perri stated he was heavily involved in the project of the plan in 2008, we should ask those companies that developed the plan what they think as opposed to believing somehow that everyone here tonight is the expert. He stated he thinks things are changing in South Bend but we need to be careful. He stated a grocery store will come downtown because he believes in it and will invest his own money in it. He stated in the past three and a half (3 %2) months he has invested $3 million in this community not only in the Wharf site but also other buildings. Mr. Perri detailed his financial commitments to the City. He stated if we are going to come together and build a community we should build consensus. It is a little disingenuous of Mr. Mathews for him to stand here and promote a project that is one hundred and seventy -five (175) feet tall when he said back in December 2013 that changing the policy from five (5) stories to eight (8) stories will have drastic consequences to the neighborhood. Now Mr. Mathews is saying that was only because the Wharf site looks suburban, that is an opinion not a fact. 22