Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING <br />AUGUST 5, 1986 <br />ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 17-1986 - <br />OF CODE ENFC <br />TING-OFF UN <br />UNTS <br />Ms. Katherine G. Barnard, Director, Department of Code <br />Enforcement, advised the Board that as a bookkeeping measure, <br />Resolution No. 17-1986 is being submitted for adoption. She <br />stated that this Resolution writes -off nine hundred eighty five <br />(985) uncollectable accounts from 1983 for a total of $55,145.75 <br />and two hundred seventy (270) accounts from 1984 for a total of <br />$22,559.75. She stated that these fees were assessed for the <br />clean-up of properties. Further, attempts have been made to <br />collect these fees by way of billings, referral to the Legal <br />Department and referral to a collection service. <br />In response to Mr. Vance's inquiry regarding whether or not <br />attempts will continue to be made to collect these fees, Ms. <br />Barnard stated that attempts will continue and occasionally, <br />fees are paid years after they were incurred. <br />In reviewing the list of accounts that are recommended to be <br />written -off, Mr. Leszczynski noted that several well known <br />individuals and companies were listed and inquired why the City <br />was unable to collect from these individuals. Ms. Barnard stated <br />that in some instances inadequate service to the appropriate <br />property owner prevents attempts to collect the fees. She stated <br />that in some cases, the property owner of record according to the <br />Assessor's office records, is not accurate in that property has <br />changed hands or is being sold on land contract with the new <br />owner not being aware of the assessment. <br />Ms. Barnard, in response to questions from the news media <br />regarding the use of the phase "uncollectable" as they refer to <br />cases in which improper service was the basis for being <br />uncollectable, stated that hundreds of properties are cleaned <br />each week and that the objective of the clean up program is to <br />clean up as many properties as possible. A decision then has to <br />be made to either get good service or to clean the lot. <br />Mr. Vance advised that the problem of finding the correct <br />property owner and collection of fees is not a new problem but <br />continues to be an ongoing problem. <br />There being no further questions, upon a motion made by Mr. <br />Vance, seconded by Mr. Leszczynski and carried, the following <br />Resolution No. 17-1986 was approved and adopted: <br />CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA <br />BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS <br />RESOLUTION NO. 17-1986 <br />WHEREAS, the City of South Bend, through its Department <br />of Code Enforcement, which is responsible for upholding the <br />environmental provisions of the South Bend Municipal Code, billed <br />the persons listed on the attached documents for charges accrued <br />by clean-up or demolition; and <br />WHEREAS, these charges have not been paid to the City of <br />South Bend, Indiana, after established notices were sent to the <br />person(s) who received the services; and <br />WHEREAS, Federated Collection Agency and/or the Legal <br />Department of the City of South Bend, Indiana, have made every <br />attempt to collect the aforementioned charges and have not been <br />successful; and <br />WHEREAS, on May 20, 1986, the Board of Public Works <br />adopted and approved a Department of Code Enforcement Collection <br />Procedure. <br />WHEREAS, the City of South Bend, Indiana, by and through <br />its Board of Public Works, desires to write-off the charges <br />listed on the attached documents; <br />1 <br />1 <br />