Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 22 1973 <br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED) <br />Mayor. He indicated that there was a penalty clause for persons violating the proposed ordinance <br />of a prison term of not more than six months or a fine not more than $500, with said person being <br />subject to removal from office. Council President Nemeth then stated the reasons for the proposed <br />ordinance. He felt the opportunity for corruption would be diminished, the departments would be <br />put on a business -like basis and be made to conform to other city departments, and the confidence <br />of the people of South Bend would be maintained as far as the Council's ability to govern effec- <br />tively. <br />Mr. Maurice Cohen, 725 Eckman Street, wondered why the taxpayers had not been furnished a copy of <br />the budget for the Waterworks Department. He stated that the utility belonged to the citizens of <br />South Bend, not the Mayor and Manager of the utility, and he felt the citizens should be furnished <br />a copy of the budget. Council President Nemeth stated that the ordinance at hand was not the actuz <br />budget ordinance for the Waterworks. He indicated that the proposed ordinance merely required that <br />a budget be submitted. He explained that the budget for the Waterworks Department had been filed <br />with the City Clerk and was available for public inspection in that office. <br />Council President Nemeth stated that he hoped the Council would make an amendment to the ordinance <br />in Section 2 by the addition of the following phrase: "and a statement of the revenues received <br />in the last complete calendar year, if any." Councilman Parent so moved, seconded by Councilman <br />Taylor. The motion carried. Councilman Parent indicated that he felt the Council was acting <br />wisely regarding the ordinance and he expressed his support of the ordinance. <br />Councilman Kopczynski made a motion that the ordinance go to the Council as favorable, as amended, <br />seconded by Councilman Szymkowiak. The motion carried. <br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE <br />MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, <br />INDIANA, 1971, BY THE ADDITION OF ARTICLE 6 <br />TO PROHIBIT THE BURNING OF LEAVES WITHIN <br />THE CITY. <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above ordinance, proponents and <br />opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Chairman Newburn reminded the citizens that this <br />portion was the public hearing and those persons who wished to speak would be heard. He requested <br />that those persons speaking refrain from using personalities in their presentations. Mayor Jerry <br />J. Miller made the presentation for the ordinance. He indicated that he has stated that the <br />Street Department would pick up every leaf that was bagged and set out for collection. He also <br />stated that a letter had been sent to all private trash haulers regarding the proposed ordinance. <br />He explained that there were certain problems regarding the leaf pickup. He mentioned that bagginc <br />would be very difficult for persons living in the heavily wooded areas. He stated that the city <br />would work with those areas as far as handling the problem other than bagging. He stated that the <br />main problem was the amount of time from the beginning of the leaf program and the first snowfall. <br />Last year, there had been a problem with the wet leaves, and he was hopeful that that problem woul� <br />not take place again. He stated that the city would use the two leaf pickers this year; however, I <br />indicated that the trucks were used almost 10 hours a day by the Sanitation Department. He <br />expressed hope that the citizens would cooperate with the Street Department on the pickup of the <br />leaves. He indicated that the Street Commissioner had made an announcement concerning the areas tc <br />be worked on for the week. He indicated that this would be done in advance so the citizens would <br />be aware of the areas each week where the leaf pickup would take place. He was hopeful that some <br />of the areas could be gone over two or three times because of the problem the city was faced with <br />now of not yet having a killing frost in order to make the leaves fall. <br />Mrs. Judy Hover, 223 Wildemere Drive, indicated that she was representing the residents of Berclifj <br />Estates. She stated that the residents in that area did not necessarily want to burn the leaves; <br />however, because of the numerous oak trees in the area, there was quite a problem with the vast <br />amount of leaves every fall and spring. She indicated that an ecologically sound alternative solu- <br />tion would be supported by the residents; however, such a solution had not yet been found. She <br />briefly talked about the size of the lots and the number of trees. She talked about the oak leave: <br />and related problems, concentrating on the problem of mulching the oak leaves which could not be <br />done because of the chemical content. She also stated that any attempts to compost the leaves <br />from any number of trees on a city lot would turn the lot into a breeding area for bugs and <br />mosquitos. She also stated that leaves in bags do not rot; likewise, plastic in the ground does <br />not rot. She talked about the cost of bagging all the leaves and the problem the older citizens <br />would have concerning the leaves. She expressed hope that, in the future, South Bend would be able <br />to institute such a leaf program as Mishawaka had done with the purchase of adequate equipment. <br />She brought up the problem of the gasoline shortage and wondered if a study had been made of the <br />city's gasoline supply of the Fire, Police and Street Departments in an effort to determine if the <br />supply could meet the demands of the leaf pick -up program and still provide for emergency needs. <br />She asked three questions of the Mayor: What agency would enforce the ordinance? How? Under what <br />budget? Mayor Miller attempted to answer Mrs. Hover's questions and comment upon the statements <br />made. He indicated that the Environmental Protection Officer would investigate the violation and <br />the name of the violator would then be turned over to the Department of Law for proper action. He <br />felt that it was time that the city investigate the possibility of having one environmental protec- <br />tion agency relating to air and noise pollution as there was too much of a duplication of services, <br />He stated that matters of this kind were very hard to prosecute. He indicated that, if the city <br />was provided with the facilities to handle the problem, it would be taken care of. He explained <br />that the money would come from already existing departments; namely, the Street Department. He <br />indicated that some of the equipment and manpower could possibly be utilized from the Park <br />Department and Sanitation Department. He assured the citizens that the city would not raise its <br />trash rates in order to handle the problem. Mr. Ed Slake, 1216 North Huey Street, indicated that <br />all he knew was what he had read in the paper. He quoted from an article which appeared in the <br />October 21st edition of the South Bend Tribune. He also mentioned the article which appeared in <br />the "Voice of the People ". He referred to the article wherein Councilman Parent had indicated that <br />it was possible that the Mayor could be authorized to allow a period of time for leaf burning if hE <br />felt it was necessary. Mr. Slake brought up the matter of cigarette smoking and asked which was <br />more dangerous. He referred to the abolishment of the county ordinance on leaf burning and talked <br />briefly on the cost of bagging the leaves. He stated that he had appeared before the Council when <br />the proposed ordinance had been given first reading and, since that time, he had received many <br />letters and telephone calls in favor of leaf burning. He wondered about the cost of the leaf <br />