Laserfiche WebLink
5 <br />IICOMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED) <br />machines and talked about the fine imposed by the burning of leaves, indicating that he felt it wa <br />way out of proportion. He quoted from a letter written by a Notre Dame football fan about the <br />running of the buses at the football games. He felt that some of the poorer taxpayers were being <br />"put up against the wall ". Mr. Slake talked about the time when he had been an employee of the <br />Street Department and the experiences he had had with leaf pickup. Mayor Miller indicated that it <br />was important that many people did not remember that the present administration had cut a great <br />deal of money from the budget that was being wasted. He explained that some cities have put this <br />type of program entirely on the tax base. He stated that, if additional equipment is purchased, <br />the taxpayers would have to pay for it. Regarding the leaf pickup, the Mayor explained that the <br />city would provide the service at no additional cost to the taxpayer. In some areas, there were <br />problems because of the great number of trees. He stated that a great deal'depends on the weather <br />which must be taken into consideration also. He stated that the city was not amending the county <br />ordinance, and indicated that the County Commissioners have jurisdiction over all places in the <br />City of South Bend as far as industrial burning and fireplace burning. He indicated that leaf <br />burning was a concern for people with heart and lung diseases. The problem was very complicated, <br />and he indicated that the city was trying to come up with a solution. He felt the leaf pick -up <br />program was the best solution and felt it would be successful. He mentioned that a study was bein <br />made on the compost of the leaves and the role the Sanitation Department played. Mr. Slake indica <br />that, as far as the increase in taxes for the additional equipment, he wanted to see consideration <br />given to the senior citizens. <br />Mr. Howard Emmons, 2627 East.McKinley, felt that one way to save taxes was to allow the burning or <br />leaves. He stated that he had approximately four acres of land and a great number of oak trees. <br />He had not been able to find anyone that could pulverize the oak leaves. He wondered how much <br />pollution there would really be if the leaves were burned and there was not much smoke. He stated <br />that, if the leaves are dry, there is mostly heat and not pollution. He wondered if this was a <br />detriment to the health of the people. He hoped that there would be some kind of relief given. <br />He felt the Street Department had enough work to do. He was hopeful a solution could be found, <br />possibly allowing burning for a few days each year. Ms. Kelly Kelsey, 1015 Hudson Avenue, repre- <br />senting the "Protect Our Planet" group, indicated that she considered it a waste to be back again <br />before the Council on the same subject as last year. She stated that environmentalists have given <br />reasons for supporting the ban on leaf burning. She urged passage of the ordinance and indicated <br />that the quality of life would be improved for the whole population and the total environment. <br />Mrs. Judy Olson, 1541 Vernerlee Lane, representing the League oz women voters anu the tuuer.Lvall <br />Association of University Women, indicated that her group supported the proposed leaf burning ban. <br />They felt clean air was a necessity in order to provide the maximum protection to the health and <br />property of the citizens. She felt the leaf collection proposal was a good alternative plan and <br />appeared quite feasible. Mr. Don Linger, 15595 Winding Brook Drive, Mishawaka, spoke on behalf of <br />the American Society of Civil Engineers. He spoke on air pollution, the proposed ordinance and <br />the burning of leaves. He referred to a graph regarding leaf burning and the concentration in the <br />air during burning periods. He urged that the Council ban the open burning of leaves. He indicate <br />that, between the period of October 15 to November 15 and the period of 30 days following, it had <br />been proven that the air was not clean. He was referring. to an air quality test conducted at the <br />Notre Dame Sampling Station in 1971. Mr. John Poorbaugh, 3512 Oakcrest Drive, stated that the <br />leaves the people were dealing with were black oak leaves and were not mulchable. He stated that <br />the Science Coordinator for the South Bend Schools indicated that there was very little pollution <br />when burning dry leaves. He stated that he was an ecology teacher at LaSalle High School. He <br />wondered what percent of air pollution was caused by leaf burning. He felt that disposal of leave: <br />by collection was not the solution. He then quoted from the August issue of the Consumer Bulletin <br />regarding a situation in New Jersey and the affect the leaves have on water and the water supply. <br />He stated that the leaves give off an acid which is taken into the water. He felt that the ground <br />and water was just as important as the air. He stated that the most practical method of disposing <br />of the leaves would be a period in the spring and fall for burning. Mr. Fred Wilson, 4701 Fellows <br />Road, indicated that there has always been a problem with leaf and snow removal. He stated that <br />those persons with large lots and many trees do have a problem. He suggested that the Mayor's pro- <br />gram be followed with the pickup of the leaves; however, that a specific period of time in the <br />spring and fall be allowed for burning leaves. He felt that, if the Mayor's program worked, then <br />there could be a ban imposed on the burning of leaves. Mrs. Connie Green, 3217 Dunham Street, <br />indicated that she lived in the inner city and there were not many trees in that area. She oppose( <br />leaf burning because of the pollution it caused, but she indicated support of leaf burning for tho! <br />persons who could not afford the bagging. She asked about the pollution caused by the industries <br />and factories within the city. She stated that those factories have not been controlled. Mr. Jac) <br />Miller, Vice President of the Civic Planning Association, indicated that pollution should be elimi- <br />nated and the city had made efforts to control the problem. He stated that the association felt a <br />two -week period in the spring and fall should be allowed until successful collection of the leaves <br />is achieved. Dr. Helen Calvin, 103 South Eddy Street, referred to the March 13, 1973, edition of <br />the Chicago Tribune regarding air pollution. She stated that science has learned much about the <br />pollution caused by nature and not by man. The rotting of leaves on the ground produces gases as <br />in burning. She expressed concern about this. She indicated that she had read studies but was not <br />aware of how harmful this would be. She stated that homeowners produce 3% of the total air pollu- <br />tion and 60% of the pollution is caused by nature. She wondered how nature could be stopped. She <br />indicated that she had written to the Environmental Protection Agency regarding this matter. They <br />had replied that, during the last 10 years, there were only 10 potentially hazardous days of air <br />pollution in the Michiana area. She stated that that only amounted to one day per year. She felt <br />the freedom of choice was being taken away from the citizens. She stated that it had been proven <br />that cigarette smoking was far worse. She asked what department of the administration defended the <br />rights of the citizens to freedom of choice. Councilman Miller replied that the Common Council wa; <br />that body. Mrs. Lee Swan, 2022 Swygart, indicated that the problem comes up every year and there <br />never appears to be a solution to the problem. Last year, she indicated that there had been a <br />great problem with the bagging of leaves. She felt that, until there was a solution, the citizens <br />should be allowed to burn the leaves for certain periods of time. She also stated that, if the <br />Environmental Protection Agency would enforce laws against burning of other materials, this would <br />not be a problem. She indicated that, at one time, leaf burning was very common. She felt the <br />industries have put the chemical garbage into the air. Ms. Kathy Kline, 1735 Bergan Drive, a <br />registered nurse, spoke against the burning of leaves. She indicated that she supported the Mayor <br />proposed ordinance and stated that air pollution correlates with heart and lung disease. She <br />indicated that leaf burning was only one contributor, but it should be taken seriously. She urged <br />the Council to vote in favor of the ordinance. Mrs. Ann Wlodarski, 1869 Riverside Drive, expresses <br />her feelings, indicating that she was in favor of a period of leaf burning for the citizens. She <br />