5
<br />IICOMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED)
<br />machines and talked about the fine imposed by the burning of leaves, indicating that he felt it wa
<br />way out of proportion. He quoted from a letter written by a Notre Dame football fan about the
<br />running of the buses at the football games. He felt that some of the poorer taxpayers were being
<br />"put up against the wall ". Mr. Slake talked about the time when he had been an employee of the
<br />Street Department and the experiences he had had with leaf pickup. Mayor Miller indicated that it
<br />was important that many people did not remember that the present administration had cut a great
<br />deal of money from the budget that was being wasted. He explained that some cities have put this
<br />type of program entirely on the tax base. He stated that, if additional equipment is purchased,
<br />the taxpayers would have to pay for it. Regarding the leaf pickup, the Mayor explained that the
<br />city would provide the service at no additional cost to the taxpayer. In some areas, there were
<br />problems because of the great number of trees. He stated that a great deal'depends on the weather
<br />which must be taken into consideration also. He stated that the city was not amending the county
<br />ordinance, and indicated that the County Commissioners have jurisdiction over all places in the
<br />City of South Bend as far as industrial burning and fireplace burning. He indicated that leaf
<br />burning was a concern for people with heart and lung diseases. The problem was very complicated,
<br />and he indicated that the city was trying to come up with a solution. He felt the leaf pick -up
<br />program was the best solution and felt it would be successful. He mentioned that a study was bein
<br />made on the compost of the leaves and the role the Sanitation Department played. Mr. Slake indica
<br />that, as far as the increase in taxes for the additional equipment, he wanted to see consideration
<br />given to the senior citizens.
<br />Mr. Howard Emmons, 2627 East.McKinley, felt that one way to save taxes was to allow the burning or
<br />leaves. He stated that he had approximately four acres of land and a great number of oak trees.
<br />He had not been able to find anyone that could pulverize the oak leaves. He wondered how much
<br />pollution there would really be if the leaves were burned and there was not much smoke. He stated
<br />that, if the leaves are dry, there is mostly heat and not pollution. He wondered if this was a
<br />detriment to the health of the people. He hoped that there would be some kind of relief given.
<br />He felt the Street Department had enough work to do. He was hopeful a solution could be found,
<br />possibly allowing burning for a few days each year. Ms. Kelly Kelsey, 1015 Hudson Avenue, repre-
<br />senting the "Protect Our Planet" group, indicated that she considered it a waste to be back again
<br />before the Council on the same subject as last year. She stated that environmentalists have given
<br />reasons for supporting the ban on leaf burning. She urged passage of the ordinance and indicated
<br />that the quality of life would be improved for the whole population and the total environment.
<br />Mrs. Judy Olson, 1541 Vernerlee Lane, representing the League oz women voters anu the tuuer.Lvall
<br />Association of University Women, indicated that her group supported the proposed leaf burning ban.
<br />They felt clean air was a necessity in order to provide the maximum protection to the health and
<br />property of the citizens. She felt the leaf collection proposal was a good alternative plan and
<br />appeared quite feasible. Mr. Don Linger, 15595 Winding Brook Drive, Mishawaka, spoke on behalf of
<br />the American Society of Civil Engineers. He spoke on air pollution, the proposed ordinance and
<br />the burning of leaves. He referred to a graph regarding leaf burning and the concentration in the
<br />air during burning periods. He urged that the Council ban the open burning of leaves. He indicate
<br />that, between the period of October 15 to November 15 and the period of 30 days following, it had
<br />been proven that the air was not clean. He was referring. to an air quality test conducted at the
<br />Notre Dame Sampling Station in 1971. Mr. John Poorbaugh, 3512 Oakcrest Drive, stated that the
<br />leaves the people were dealing with were black oak leaves and were not mulchable. He stated that
<br />the Science Coordinator for the South Bend Schools indicated that there was very little pollution
<br />when burning dry leaves. He stated that he was an ecology teacher at LaSalle High School. He
<br />wondered what percent of air pollution was caused by leaf burning. He felt that disposal of leave:
<br />by collection was not the solution. He then quoted from the August issue of the Consumer Bulletin
<br />regarding a situation in New Jersey and the affect the leaves have on water and the water supply.
<br />He stated that the leaves give off an acid which is taken into the water. He felt that the ground
<br />and water was just as important as the air. He stated that the most practical method of disposing
<br />of the leaves would be a period in the spring and fall for burning. Mr. Fred Wilson, 4701 Fellows
<br />Road, indicated that there has always been a problem with leaf and snow removal. He stated that
<br />those persons with large lots and many trees do have a problem. He suggested that the Mayor's pro-
<br />gram be followed with the pickup of the leaves; however, that a specific period of time in the
<br />spring and fall be allowed for burning leaves. He felt that, if the Mayor's program worked, then
<br />there could be a ban imposed on the burning of leaves. Mrs. Connie Green, 3217 Dunham Street,
<br />indicated that she lived in the inner city and there were not many trees in that area. She oppose(
<br />leaf burning because of the pollution it caused, but she indicated support of leaf burning for tho!
<br />persons who could not afford the bagging. She asked about the pollution caused by the industries
<br />and factories within the city. She stated that those factories have not been controlled. Mr. Jac)
<br />Miller, Vice President of the Civic Planning Association, indicated that pollution should be elimi-
<br />nated and the city had made efforts to control the problem. He stated that the association felt a
<br />two -week period in the spring and fall should be allowed until successful collection of the leaves
<br />is achieved. Dr. Helen Calvin, 103 South Eddy Street, referred to the March 13, 1973, edition of
<br />the Chicago Tribune regarding air pollution. She stated that science has learned much about the
<br />pollution caused by nature and not by man. The rotting of leaves on the ground produces gases as
<br />in burning. She expressed concern about this. She indicated that she had read studies but was not
<br />aware of how harmful this would be. She stated that homeowners produce 3% of the total air pollu-
<br />tion and 60% of the pollution is caused by nature. She wondered how nature could be stopped. She
<br />indicated that she had written to the Environmental Protection Agency regarding this matter. They
<br />had replied that, during the last 10 years, there were only 10 potentially hazardous days of air
<br />pollution in the Michiana area. She stated that that only amounted to one day per year. She felt
<br />the freedom of choice was being taken away from the citizens. She stated that it had been proven
<br />that cigarette smoking was far worse. She asked what department of the administration defended the
<br />rights of the citizens to freedom of choice. Councilman Miller replied that the Common Council wa;
<br />that body. Mrs. Lee Swan, 2022 Swygart, indicated that the problem comes up every year and there
<br />never appears to be a solution to the problem. Last year, she indicated that there had been a
<br />great problem with the bagging of leaves. She felt that, until there was a solution, the citizens
<br />should be allowed to burn the leaves for certain periods of time. She also stated that, if the
<br />Environmental Protection Agency would enforce laws against burning of other materials, this would
<br />not be a problem. She indicated that, at one time, leaf burning was very common. She felt the
<br />industries have put the chemical garbage into the air. Ms. Kathy Kline, 1735 Bergan Drive, a
<br />registered nurse, spoke against the burning of leaves. She indicated that she supported the Mayor
<br />proposed ordinance and stated that air pollution correlates with heart and lung disease. She
<br />indicated that leaf burning was only one contributor, but it should be taken seriously. She urged
<br />the Council to vote in favor of the ordinance. Mrs. Ann Wlodarski, 1869 Riverside Drive, expresses
<br />her feelings, indicating that she was in favor of a period of leaf burning for the citizens. She
<br />
|