IICOMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED)
<br />Council to raise salaries. He stated that state law gives the Council the right to raise or lower
<br />police and fire salaries; however, the Council does not have the right of raising the salaries of
<br />other employees. He indicated that the Council must take into consideration the fact of where the
<br />money would be coming from. He indicated that the budget increase is 1.4 million dollars and the
<br />salaries were only a part of that. He stated that an exact figure is not known at the present time
<br />and that the increase in the tax revenues would be approximately $400,000. He also indicated that
<br />the Council did not like the $200 increase; however, it was the best that could be done under the
<br />circumstances. He pointed out that, last year, the policemen and firemen received adequate wages
<br />from the Council. Councilman Parent indicated that the decision to give a raise of $200 was not
<br />made by the Council. He stated that he would like to be able to give more than the $200, and he
<br />added that he hoped the city would not lose good employees because of the low increase. He was
<br />hopeful that, next year, the city would be able to give its employees more. Councilman Szymkowiak
<br />indicated that he had been against disparity between the policemen and firemen for as long as he ha
<br />been on the Council. He recommended that the firemen go on a 56 -hour work week, and he concluded
<br />that, if the money was available, a higher increase would be given. Chairman Newburn indicated
<br />that he knew the $200 increase was not sufficient for the working man. He felt a serious look
<br />should be given the top echelon. He did not agree that a man with a substantial salary should be
<br />given more than the blue collar worker. He felt some money was not being allocated properly.
<br />Councilman Miller.made a motion that the ordinance go to the Council as favorable, seconded by
<br />Council President Nemeth. The motion carried. (Chairman Newburn opposed.)
<br />II nRnTNAWR
<br />AN ORDINANCE FIXING THE MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM
<br />SALARIES AND WAGES OF APPOINTED OFFICERS AND
<br />EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA,
<br />FOR THE YEAR 1974.
<br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above ordinance, proponents and
<br />opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Mayor Miller made the presentation for the
<br />ordinance. He stated that he did not believe that any of the raises for 1974 for the employees
<br />were adequate. He indicated that the councilmen could have had the opportunity to learn about the
<br />raises if they had attended the caucus held for that reason. He indicated that the proposed
<br />ordinance included 35 additional employees over the 1973 budget; however, there are only 1,488
<br />persons employed, less than in the past. He stated that, on July 1, 1974, the city would lose 58
<br />employees from the Emergency Employment Program. He stated that he would like to make an explana-
<br />tion as far as each increase was concerned. He stated that the City Clerk would explain the increa
<br />for her employees. He indicated that the city's recommendation was made about four weeks ago after
<br />the County Council rejected the option tax. He indicated that, with the tax, it was estimated
<br />South Bend would receive $790,000 additional money to operate for 1974. Without the tax, it was
<br />estimated South Bend would receive $300,000 to $350,000 from assessed valuation increases. He did
<br />not know if that figure was correct. He mentioned that a budget had been presented to him that
<br />amounted to a three and one -half million dollar increase, and he stated that he did not ask the
<br />department heads to determine which programs have priorities. He stated that it was the Council's
<br />duty to do that. He indicated that the budget must be cut from 1.4 million dollars to between
<br />$700,000 and $750,000. He stated that it was not fair to ask the citizens to pay the option tax
<br />and not benefit from it. Mayor Miller then proceeded to explain some of the salary increases. He
<br />indicated that the Chief Deputy City Attorney's salary was being increased $1,000'because of the
<br />amount of time involved in annexation cases. He explained that, last year, the salaries of the
<br />cabinet officials were cut, and he was recommending that the Director of the Department of Human
<br />Resources receive $17,000 for the 1974 salary. He briefly talked about the need for a park
<br />naturalist at Rum Village Park at a salary of $8,750, and that-the salary for the Senior Citizens
<br />Director should only reflect a $200 increase. Because of the new downtown mall, a foreman was pro-
<br />posed at $3,150. He further explained that the dog catcher position was needed in order to help
<br />solve the problem in the community and this was why the position was being retained. He indicated
<br />that there would be two positions at $3,500. He recommended that the position of General Foreman
<br />at $4.63 per hour at the Municipal Services Facility be deleted and the position of Maintenance
<br />Supervisor be established at an annual salary of $12,000. He mentioned that, in the Solid Waste
<br />Department, the engineer and foreman were in the revenue sharing budget and should be accepted full
<br />time by the city budget. He explained that the position of Meter Reader I was set at $2,883 for
<br />1973 and there was a $200 increase. He indicated that this was a full -time position. He mentioned
<br />his secretary's proposed increase to $9,000 and indicated that the Legislative Assistant for the
<br />Council at $15,000 was a new position. He indicated that the increases were slight and, in July,
<br />the city would have employed around 1,400 employees. He explained that the budget of 1.4 million
<br />dollars was not cut to $700,000 because of many items needed; however, with the Council's recommen-
<br />dation, he was hopeful the budget could be cut. He explained that the Lilly Foundation was doing
<br />a study on fiscal management and South Bend was involved in the study. He indicated that one of
<br />the remarks made concerning the study was that it was wondered how a city could operate without
<br />knowing how much money would be available. Mayor Miller was apologetic because of the slight
<br />increase in the salaries. He indicated that, when the city had control over additional revenue, a
<br />cost of living increase would be given and would be made up for in 1974. He indicated that, last
<br />year, 532% was recommended because of the guidelines set by the president. He explained that, today
<br />the guidelines were the same; however, the city did not have the money to follow those guidelines.
<br />He commended the Council on cutting certain programs in order to give a raise in 1974. He stated
<br />that, if the General Assembly did not make some changes, there would be less money in 1974 than at
<br />present. He explained that the city's tax rate is frozen for the next four years and the only
<br />increase available is the assessed valuation of the community. He did not think all the revenue
<br />sharing funds should be used for increases in salaries because at some future time the taxpayer
<br />would have to pick that up. Regarding the Civic Center, he explained that, if the city did not
<br />pay for it out of revenue sharing money, the contributions would have to be received in other ways.
<br />He stated that the taxpayers are benefiting because revenue sharing money was being used. He
<br />indicated that the Council has cooperated 100% and the Controller's Office had done a fine job in
<br />the preparation of the salary figures. He also mentioned that he was disappointed with the
<br />increases; however, the city must live by its state legislation. He indicated that he would go
<br />along with whatever changes the Council proposed.
<br />Mr. Michael Lawrence, representing the Teamsters Local 364, indicated that the union represented
<br />350 members employed by eight bureaus of the City of South Bend and the Park Department. He
<br />indicated that the union's agreement expired May 30, 1973, and agreement was reached on all issues
<br />except wages. He indicated that the membership has rejected the $200 increase and proposed-that
<br />the matter be submitted to arbitration, which proposal was refused. He quoted portions of articles
<br />appearing recently in the South Bend Tribune relating to the cost of living and increases. On
<br />
|