Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING -TTTT.Y 23 1973 <br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED) <br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE FIXING THE ANNUAL PAY OF <br />POLICEMEN FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1974. <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above ordinance, proponents and <br />opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Police Chief Robert Urban made the presentation <br />for the ordinance. He explained that the 1974 raise for personnel within the department and <br />civilian employees would amount to $200. He indicated that the department had employed 254 active <br />police officers, 36 cadets, 26 civil employees, 5 meter maids and 61 crossing guards for a total of <br />383 employees. He concluded by indicating that the increase for salaries would amount to $76,600. <br />Mr. Maurice Cohen, 725 East Eckman, indicated that he could not understand the $200 increase in the <br />salaries. He mentioned that Gary, Indiana, was able to give their employees a 12% increase and <br />Mishawaka employees received a $400 increase. He mentioned that it was proposed that some city <br />officials receive a $2,000 increase and the dedicated policemen only get $200 and risk their lives <br />(daily. He indicated that this did not make any sense. He stated that the $200 would not even <br />absorb the cost of living. He felt the money was available and should be given in increased salary <br />and he stated that $30,000 for one particular office could be divided among the Police Department <br />employees. He stated that the demand upon the men was very great and the price for food and other <br />items was the same for the policemen and the officials and the policemen do not have their cars <br />furnished. Mrs. Ann Wlodarski, 1869 Riverside Drive, indicated that she was a member of the St. <br />Joseph County Fair Tax Association and a retired property owner and she desired to speak as a <br />retired property owner. Her suggestion was to eliminate the Department of Safety and divide those <br />funds among the policemen who are needed to protect the citizens and their homes. She felt the <br />policemen were badly needed and there were not enough men. She concluded by indicating that the <br />crime situation has not decreased since the creation of the Department of Safety. Miss Virginia <br />Guthrie, Executive Secretary of the Civic Planning Association, quoted from a letter of the Board <br />of Directors of the Civic Planning Association, which board recommended that all full -time executiv <br />and employees be treated similar and receive the $200 increase with part -time employees receiving <br />an increase proportionate to their hours of work. She presented the letter to the City Clerk. <br />Councilman Horvath indicated that the Council had received the proposed budget for consideration, <br />and the Council's only power was to cut salaries and not raise them. He indicated that the Council <br />had been informed that the money was not available for higher increases. He regretted that. <br />Councilman Serge indicated that he hoped the policemen and new recruits would appreciate the <br />Council's position. He indicated that it could only work from the proposals given to it. He <br />could not understand why South Bend could not come up with a better increase in salaries. He felt <br />the services would be rendered if the police officers were happy. Councilman Szymkowiak indicated <br />that he sympathized with the firemen and policemen and other city workers; however, the city's tax <br />base was frozen and there was nothing the Council could do. He indicated that he would like to see <br />the employees get paid a living wage. Councilman Parent indicated that the Council did not know <br />how much money they had to work with because the assessment on properties was not known. He stated <br />that, if the federal revenue sharing funds were not available, the situation would be worse. He <br />concluded that the councilmen agreed that the $200 was a ridiculous figure; however, at the present <br />time, it was all that could be given. <br />Councilman Miller made a motion that the ordinance go to the Council as favorable, seconded by <br />Councilman Horvath. The motion carried. <br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE FIXING THE ANNUAL PAY OF <br />FIREMEN FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1974. <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above ordinance, proponents and <br />opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Council President Nemeth indicated that the raise <br />for the firemen was the same figure as in the ordinance for the policemen. He indicated that no <br />presentation was necessary and, if the Council requested an explanation, it would ask for it. Mr. <br />Carl Zwierzynski, President of the Local Fire Fighters, indicated that the cost of living was up <br />about 8 %. He stated that the Wage Committee for the Fire Fighters proposed a 5.5% raise and the <br />proposed ordinance only reflects a 2% raise. He mentioned disparity in pay, and stated that he <br />could not understand why there was disparity between the policemen and firemen. Regarding <br />Councilman Horvath's statement about the Council not having the power to raise the salaries, Mr. <br />Zwierzynski indicated that one year ago, the Council had raised some wages. Mr. Maurice Cohen, <br />725 East Eckman, indicated that the Council could have raised the proposals before they were <br />incorporated into the ordinance and filed. He stated that sympathy on the part of the councilmen <br />would not give the policemen or firemen one penny. He talked briefly on the increases in the price <br />of food and other goods. Mr. John Nelson, 915 Emerson Avenue, indicated that he was chairman of <br />the wage committee and last year, he had been promised that disparity between the policemen and <br />firemen would end. He wondered what had happened to that promise. Mr. Paul Bognar, 805 West <br />Washington Avenue, indicated that the Council did have the power to change the ordinance if desired <br />Mr. George Scallions, 610 California Avenue, indicated that he has worked for nine years for the <br />Street Department and started at $1.65 an hour. He indicated that, if it was not for the Police <br />and Fire Departments, there would not be a city; however, he also indicated that the Street <br />Department was needed to plow and clear and maintain the streets in order for the policemen and <br />firemen to do their jobs. He indicated that the Street Department employees work very hard in all <br />kinds of weather and he could not understand why some officials should be entitled to a $2,000 <br />increase and the rest of the employees only entitled to $200. He pleaded with the Council that it <br />help the workers. Mrs. Janet Allen, 125 West Marion Street, wondered why the policemen and firemen <br />were getting the "small end of the line ". She felt it was because there was so many of them. She <br />felt they had been neglected over the years. She stated that it was the duty of the Council to set <br />the salaries for the policemen and firemen and the duty of the administration was to advise. She <br />felt the inequities would be eliminated if this was done. She felt the policemen and firemen <br />should be encouraged as much as possible and that the city could not afford to have them the lowest <br />paid. Dr. Helen Calvin, 103 South Eddy, indicated that what the city needed was good employees who <br />could feed themselves and would not have to beg. She felt all the money that was being sent to <br />Washington was not necessary. She stated that now the city had to beg to get some of that money <br />back. She felt local government should stand up to the people in Washington because something had <br />to be done. Mr. Dennis DeBuysser, 1221 East Victoria, wondered if the Council could legally raise <br />the salaries, if revenue sharing funds still existed and had to be used in 1973 or if they could <br />be used to raise the salaries. He felt that much of the revenue sharing money was going into <br />accounts where it was not needed. Chairman Newburn indicated that the answer to Mr. DeBuysser's <br />questions was "yes ". Mr. DeBuysser indicated that he hoped the revenue sharing funds could be used <br />for that purpose. Council President Nemeth indicated that he wanted to clarify the right of the <br />