REGULAR MEETING JULY 23 1973
<br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED)
<br />May 22, 1973, an article appeared regarding President Nixon's Phase III economic controls and it
<br />stated that the cost of living had increased at an annual rate of 9.2 %. On June 7, 1973, the
<br />wholesale price index took a jump of 2.1% over April. On June 21, 1973, the rise in the cost of
<br />living in May worked out to an annual rate of 7.2 %, and in July, an article appeared regarding the
<br />increase in farm products. Mr. Lawrence indicated that he was aware of the fiscal problems of the
<br />Council and the city, he realized the option tax was not adopted by the County Council and he also
<br />realized the needs of the city were enormous; however, he indicated that other Indiana cities were
<br />able to provide a more realistic wage increase. He indicated that the following cities were con-
<br />sidering the following increases:
<br />Richmond .. ............................... 6%
<br />Mishawaka ................................ 5% and up
<br />St. Joseph County Highway Department ..... 5%
<br />St. Joseph County Park Department ........52% and up
<br />Fort Wayne ... ............................15� per hour
<br />Terre Haute .. ............................12� to 15� per hour
<br />Michigan City ............................ 7%
<br />Evansville ... ............................52% and up
<br />He wondered why South Bend could not do the same. He quoted a portion of Mayor Miller's 1972
<br />annual report referring to the establishment of the Department of Human Resources and Economic
<br />Development. He felt that the administration and the Council had failed in its responsibility to
<br />the 1,475 city employees. He stated that the only real tool the workers possess is the right to
<br />strike and that had been denied them. He referred to portions of a report entitled "Collective
<br />Bargaining in American Government" which referred to the establishment of a special board to work
<br />at such a time as was present. He concluded by indicating that the union would like that fact -
<br />finding concept considered by the Council at some later date. Mr. Maurice Cohen, 725 East Eckman,
<br />talked briefly about the Street Department employees. He felt the city was not allocating funds
<br />properly, and he referred to the increase in the Mayor's secretary's salary and the cabinet
<br />officials' increases. He felt nepotism, favortism and patronage should not be taken into consider
<br />tion. Mrs. Irene Gammon, City Clerk, explained her reasons for the increases proposed for the
<br />positions of Chief Deputy and Deputy. She indicated that, at the time the budgets were submitted,
<br />the department heads were asked to leave the salaries blank. She indicated that she had tried to
<br />receive some guidance regarding the salary increases but had not received any. She stated that,
<br />at this time, she would not want her employees to receive a greater increase than was being given
<br />to other city employees and she hoped the Council would reduce the salaries of her workers in line
<br />with other employees. Chairman Newburn referred to the remark made by the Mayor regarding the
<br />absence of the councilmen at the salary caucus meeting by stating that he would have attended the
<br />meeting; however, he had been involved with contract negotiations at AM General Corporation. Miss
<br />Virginia Guthrie, Executive Secretary of the Civic Planning Association, indicated that when pri-
<br />vate business must cut back, the rest of the people must work more. She mentioned that it was
<br />difficult to tell exactly what the total increase in the budget would be. She wondered how many
<br />people were employed in the various positions and talked about reduction of employees. She
<br />indicated that, as of May 1, 1974, the County Council would again consider the option tax and, at
<br />that time, it might become effective. She stated that many people in the community were not even
<br />getting a cost of living increase. Mrs. Lee Swan, 2022 Swygart, referred to the increase proposed
<br />for the Mayor's secretary and some cabinet members. She indicated that the Mayor's secretary has
<br />a secretary, to which much of the work is "shuffled ", along with a great deal -of work being
<br />referred to the Mayor's Action Line. She indicated that it is not easy to obtain the right infor-
<br />mation from that center. She indicated that, in increasing some of the salaries of the cabinet
<br />officials, considering the fringe benefits, it amounts to $20,000. Mr. John Braboy, Chief Steward
<br />in the Street Department, indicated that $200 was not a sufficient increase. He indicated that,
<br />after deductions, a person could not even live on that. He indicated that he takes home only $195
<br />every two weeks, and he concluded by indicating that he was working for nothing. Mr. Lucian
<br />Szymanski, 810 South Lake Street, quoted a statement from the St. Joseph County Wage and Salary
<br />Committee regarding the proposed city salary increases. Mr. Larry Cook, 1510 Johnson Street,
<br />indicated that about 90% of the firemen in the union voted for a strike, and he mentioned that the E
<br />men mean what they say. He stated that they could not live on what they are taking home. He con-
<br />cluded by stating that the firemen get paid for what they know, not who they know. Mr. Maurice
<br />Cohen, 725 East Eckman, referred to the position of Legislative Assistant to the Council for $15,0
<br />He indicated that state senators and representatives were in South Bend, and he questioned why this
<br />position was needed when the policemen and firemen could not even get a decent raise. He question c
<br />the position of dog catcher and indicated that the animal problem should be handled by the Humane
<br />Society because it is receiving funds from the city. He indicated that he appreciated the fact
<br />that Mrs. Gammon had decreased the salaries of her employees from the proposed amount. He also
<br />mentioned that he wondered if the citizens were aware that the City Controller received a salary o
<br />$15,000 and also received $2,000 from being a member of the Water Works Commission. He also state
<br />that cars are furnished to the cabinet members in many cases. He questioned the payroll of the
<br />Water Department. Mrs. Janet Allen, 125 West Marion Street, also questioned the position of dog
<br />catcher and indicated that the Humane Society was taking care of the problem and it was covered
<br />through the Model Cities programs in that area. She concluded by indicating that the only
<br />equitable thing to do was to give all employees a $200 increase. Mayor Miller indicated that the
<br />Water Department budget was presented and would be again. He mentioned that there was a decrease
<br />in payroll in that department. A gentleman employed by the Street Department indicated that the
<br />city could not.survive without that department, and he felt it was just as important to South Bend
<br />as its police and fire protection.
<br />Council President Nemeth made a motion to amend the ordinance by deleting the position of General
<br />Foreman at the Municipal Services Facility and inserting the position of Maintenance Supervisor at
<br />a rate of $12,000, seconded by Councilman Kopczynski. The motion carried. Council President Neme i
<br />then made a motion to amend the ordinance further as follows:
<br />Chief Deputy City Attorney ........
<br />Director, Human Resources .................
<br />Superintendent of Parks ...................
<br />Recreation Planner ........................
<br />Senior Citizens Director ..................
<br />Director, Public Safety ...................
<br />Secretary I .........
<br />Accounting Clerk I ........................
<br />Stenographer I ............................
<br />$ 7,571
<br />16,200
<br />15,950
<br />12,000
<br />5,015
<br />15,200
<br />4,500 Minimum
<br />5,000 Minimum
<br />4,500 Minimum
<br />
|