Opening of Proposals - Olive WTP Solar GESC Proj No 124-050 - Schneider Electric

Home Browse Search

Life IS On I Schneider OEIectric Option A Lighting: Methodology and Savings Summary The following section was included in an earlier report. It is reprinted here for consistency and to provide a full picture of Year 1 savings. Schneider Electric employed the "Option A— Partially Measured Retrofit Isolation" method as described in the International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP) when determining the energy savings resulting from the lighting retrofits. The Option A method required the lighting fixture power consumption for both pre -retrofit fixtures and post - retrofit fixtures to be measured. Measurements of the fixture types listed in Schedule D of the Energy Services Contract were taken once during the installation period and will not be repeated. There was one pre -retrofit and one post -retrofit fixture type that weren't measured. The expected wattages for those and other non - measured fixture types were used in the calculations. All measurements can be found in Appendix A. Once taken, the measurements were combined with the estimated burn hours detailed in Schedule D to determine the amount of energy saved. The equations and methods used are also described in Schedule D. Appendix A shows all of the components and calculations used to compute the savings and the total calculated energy and cost savings per retrofit in the rightmost columns. The cost savings achieved were calculated using energy rates listed in Schedule D. The table below shows a summary of the total fixture retrofit consumption and dollar savings by building. Police Station 48,817 11 $6,149 City Hall 9,133 4 $1,529 Transit Building 19,233 7 $2,951 Park Admin 14,809 6 $2,272 East Plant 635 1 $221 Fire Station 1 25,721 5 $3,126 Fire Station 2 6,673 1 $1,024 City 183,170 0 $8,604 Total 308,191 34 $25, 877