My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/20/12 Board of Public Works Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Minutes
>
2012
>
11/20/12 Board of Public Works Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2015 4:19:54 PM
Creation date
12/12/2012 8:16:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Minutes
Document Date
11/20/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
AGENDA REVIEW SESSION NOVEMBER 15 2012 366 <br />moving the fitness room clown to the basement, He noted if necessary, they could add to the east <br />or west, and there's a possibility the city could acquire a small piece of land to the west <br />eventually. Ms. Roos noted the ' fee for the design is higher than the typical 10% of the <br />engineering cost, and asked if there is a reason. Ms. Jackie Hilderbrandt, MPA, stated their base <br />fee is 9% of the project cost; the additional costs are for reimbursables such as State filing fees, <br />printing of plans, etc. Mr. Gilot noted the City uses a virtual plan room where contractors pay a <br />fee for the plans and specifications. Ms. Hilderbrandt acknowledged that there wouldn't be a <br />charge for that expense then, the billing is based on what costs are incurred. Mr. Gilot stated they <br />need to make sure the engineers understand the full scope of the project from the beginning and <br />noted the City doesn't want to increase the cost. He added he was pleased to see Ms. <br />Hilderbrandt, a representative from a MBE firm. Ms. Greene stated she noticed the quotes for the <br />survey work were prepared for MPA by Palm & Associates, Inc. She stated if the City hasn't <br />authorized MPA to get the survey done, the quotes need to be made to the City. Mr. Gilot stated <br />they will also need to put a sentence in their agreement that the City will authorize MPA to use <br />the survey information in their design. <br />- Change Order — Memorial Hospital Facade <br />Mr. Toy Villa, Engineering, stated he needed to correct the agenda, to state Holladay <br />Construction; he erroneously put Rieth Riley on the agenda. Mr. Villa stated the increases on this <br />project were all due to unforeseen circumstances. He explained that part of that cost was from <br />the addition of full glass windows that weigh more than the original smaller windows and <br />required additional support. He noted this couldn't have been seen until tearing into the wall. Ms. <br />Greene agreed that these were all unforeseen; she stated they just need to make sure they aren't <br />over the 20% Change Order threshold. <br />- Amended Professional Services Agreement — Christopher B. Burke Engineering, LLC <br />Mr. Toy Villa, Engineering, stated this project was originally awarded for 1'/2 inspectors to be on <br />site, but due to additional work added to the project, Christopher Burke Engineering needed to <br />assign additional time that required the '/2 time person to be on the job full time. Mr. Gilot <br />questioned who did the design. Mr. Villa stated Abonmarche did. Mr. Gilot stated, so when <br />you're doing review, you need to watch the costs and hold them accountable for additional work <br />not put in the original design scope. Mr. Gilot stated we don't want to keep going back to firms <br />that are costing us money on change orders; if this would have been a contractor working on a <br />project, we would have collected liquidated damages, but this was for design and plans that they <br />came up with, and they were wrong. <br />- Bid Award — Re- Lighting for Leighton Complex, Main/Colfax, and Wayne Street Parking <br />Garages <br />Ms. Greene informed Mr. Jonathon Burke, Energy Department, that it is her understanding that <br />funds are appropriated for two of the garages, but not the Leighton Garage. She stated she was <br />asked if you could encumber 2013 funds in advance in 2012 to award in 2012; she stated you <br />cannot. She added the next question was whether the low bidder was willing to extend their bid <br />for sixty (60) days, could they do that to award in 2013. Ms. Greene stated they could do that, <br />but this was not set up as a divisible bid. She noted Indiana Statute allows the City to hold the <br />bids for sixty (60) days before awarding, but the contractor can offer to honor his bid for ninety <br />(90) days. <br />- Agreement -- Facility Dude Utility Trac <br />Mr. Jonathon Burke, Energy Office, stated this agreement is for utility tracking software to track <br />all division energy usage and generate reports. He noted it is a monumental task to set up the <br />program for an entity as large as the City. He stated he looked at other utility tracking software, <br />and most will allow you to use their software for thirty (30) days for free. He noted he didn't like <br />that, because it's too much information you're putting into the system and if it doesn't work well, <br />it's a lot of wasted time. This company, he added, allows you a year free trial period. He noted <br />this is more of an interim solution; once the program is set up, and running successfully, the City <br />can take it over. Mr. Gilot stated he thought this was a SCADA system and more involved, <br />explaining that is why he tabled this item previously. He noted that being this is cloud supported <br />software that will probably get displaced by future software and it's free for a year, he is okay <br />with it. <br />BOARD MEMBER EXCUSED <br />Ms. Kathryn Roos excused herself from the meeting at 11:20 a.m. and requested the Clerk ask <br />that someone come to Tuesday's meeting and present on Item 9E, a Professional Services <br />Proposal with Christopher B. Burke Engineering regarding design services related to the final <br />alternative approved by the Redevelopment Commission for the Fellows Street project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.