My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revised City of South Bend Disparity Study Report
sbend
>
Public
>
Inclusive Procurement and Contracting Board (MBE/WBE)
>
Reports
>
Revised City of South Bend Disparity Study Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2020 1:57:54 PM
Creation date
11/3/2020 1:55:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Letter
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of South Bend Disparity Study 2020 <br />We employ a multiple regression statistical technique to process this data. This <br />methodology allows us to perform two analyses: an estimation of how variations <br />in certain characteristics (called independent variables) will impact the level of <br />some particular outcome (called a dependent variable), and a determination of <br />how confident we are that the estimated variation is statistically different from <br />zero. We have provided more detail on this technique in Appendix A. <br />With respect to the first result of regression analysis, we will examine how varia- <br />tions in the race, gender, and industry of individuals impact the wages and other <br />economic outcomes received by individuals. The technique allows us to determine <br />the effect of changes in one variable, assuming that the other determining vari- <br />ables are the same. That is, we compare individuals of different races, but of the <br />same gender and in the same industry; or we compare individuals of different gen- <br />ders, but of the same race and the same industry; or we compare individuals in d"rf- <br />ferent industries, but of the same race and gender. We are determining the <br />impact of changes in one variable (e.g., race, gender or industry) on another vari- <br />able (wages), "controlling for' the movement of any other independent variables. <br />With respect to the second result of regression analysis, thistechnique also allows <br />us to determine the statistical significance of the relationship between the depen- <br />dent variable and independent variable. For example, the relationship between <br />gender and wages might exist but we find that it is not statistically different from <br />zero. In this case, we are not confident that there is not any relationship between <br />the two variables. If the relationship is not statistically different from zero, then a <br />variation in the independent variable has no impact on the dependent variable. <br />The regression analysis allows us to say with varying degrees of statistical confi- <br />dence that a relationship is different from zero. If the estimated relationship is sta- <br />tistically significant at the 0.05 level, that indicates we are 95 percent confident <br />that the relationship is different from zero; if the estimated relationship is statisti- <br />cally significant at the 0.01 level, that indicates we are 99 percent confident that <br />the relationship is different from zero; if the estimated relationship is statistically <br />significant at the 0.001 level, that indicates we are 99.9 percent confident that the <br />relationship is different from zero. 147 <br />In the next section, we report: data on the share of a demographic group that <br />forms a business (business formation rates); the probabilities that a demographic <br />group will form a business relative to White men (business formation probabili- <br />ties); the differences in wages received by a demographic group relative to White <br />men (wage differentials); and the differences in business earnings received by a <br />demographic group relative to White men (business earnings differentials). The <br />147. Most social scientists do not endorse utilizing a confidence level of less than 95 percent. (Another way of stating a confi- <br />dence level of 95 percent is to state the results are statistically significance at the 0.05 leveQ Appendix C explains more <br />about statistical significance. <br />79 ©1010 Colette Holt & Associates, All Rights Reserved <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.