My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revised City of South Bend Disparity Study Report
sbend
>
Public
>
Inclusive Procurement and Contracting Board (MBE/WBE)
>
Reports
>
Revised City of South Bend Disparity Study Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2020 1:57:54 PM
Creation date
11/3/2020 1:55:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Letter
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CCS of South Bend Disparity Study 2020 <br />small number of observations restricted our ability to produce reliable estimates <br />of any industry sector below the aggregation level of All Industries. <br />One method of exploring differences in economic outcomes is to examine the rate <br />at which different demographic groups form businesses. We developed these <br />business formation rates using data from the U.S. Bureau of the Census' American <br />Community Survey. Table 5-4 presents these results. The table indicates that <br />White men have higher business formation rates compared to all other groups <br />except for Asians. Table 5-5 utilizes probit regression analysis to examine the prob- <br />ability of forming a business after controlling for important factors beyond race <br />and gender. 148 This table indicates that Blacks, Latinos, and White women are less <br />likely to form businesses compared to similarly situated White men. The reduced <br />probabilities of business formation were 2.8 percent for Blacks and 1.8 percent for <br />Latinos and White women. These results for Blacks and White women were statis- <br />tically significant at the 0.001 level; the results for Latino were statistically signifi- <br />cant at the 0.01 level. Another way to measure equity is to examine how the wage <br />and salary incomes and business earnings of particular demographic groups com- <br />pare to White men. Multiple regression statistical techniques allowed us to exam- <br />ine the impact of race and gender on economic outcome while controlling for <br />other factors, such as education, that might impact outcomes. 149 Tables 5-6 and <br />5-7 present this data on wage and salary incomes and business earnings respec- <br />tively. Table 5-6 indicates that non -Whites and White women earn less than White <br />men. The reduction in earnings range from 35.6 percent to 14.6 percent and all of <br />the results are statistically significant at the 0.001 level. Table 5-7 indicates that <br />except for Asians and Others, non -Whites and White women receive business <br />earnings less than White men. However, only the result for White women are sta- <br />tistically significant at the 0.001 level.150 <br />Table 5-4: Business Formation Rates <br />All Industries, 2012 - 2016 <br />Demographic <br />Black <br />1.3% <br />Latino <br />2.0% <br />Native American <br />1.8% <br />Asian/Pacific Islander <br />4.6% <br />Other <br />2.4% <br />148. Appendix B provides a "Further Explanation of Probit Regression Analysis." <br />149. See Appendix A for more information an multiple regression statistical analysis. <br />150. The proper way to interpret a coefficient that Is less than -100 percent like the value of the coefficient for Native Ameri- <br />can in Table 5-7, is the percentage is the amount non-M/WBEs earn more than the group in question. In this case, non- <br />M/WBEs earn 572 percent more than Native American. <br />0 2020 Colette Holt & Associates, All Rights Reserved. 79 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.