Laserfiche WebLink
APPLICATION ITEMS: A. Replace existing aluminum storm with new. B. Addition of exterior deck. C. Reside upper portion <br />with historical cedar shake look (vinyl siding) second level with 4" vinyl. <br />DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: New owner originally proposed to replace the original windows but has updated the <br />request to replace only the existing aluminum windows, in-kind; add an exterior deck in the rear with similar style as new 211 <br />storey deck; and add new vinyl siding to the upper stories to resemble the look of the cedar shake and wood clapboard. A. Owner <br />will be rehabilitating the original wood double hung windows and proposes to install the new storm windows to replace the <br />existing which are deteriorated and missing most of the glass. B. Owner proposes a new deck on the ground level in the rear that <br />will fit directly underneath the new 2nd storey deck posts and will connect to a freestanding existing concrete stair (evidence that <br />a landing existed here at one point). Material will be treated lumber. A rail will be installed on three sides in the same style as the <br />upper deck. C. The asphalt siding removal by 1St Source Bank in 2013 revealed the original siding as brick 1St, wood clapboard <br />2nd and cedar shake 31d. Minor repairs were made at that time including improper flashing and a fresh coat of interior paint to the <br />siding. The existing siding is in need of major repairs as can be seen in the photographs. Owner has provided samples of the <br />proposed vinyl siding. The 2nd storey to show a 4" reveal, similar to the existing clapboard and the 31 storey to resemble cedar <br />shake but in a slightly different pattern than the existing saw tooth pattern. <br />PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT (EDITED): Upon inspection the windows are not deteriorated beyond repair as <br />suggested by the standards and guidelines. Rather, there needs to be some new glazing applied and some new ropes installed. A <br />number of the upper sashes are painted in place but are not fully closed. There are aluminum track storm windows on the house, <br />but many of the sashes are missing. The siding on the second floor and the dormer reveals are the areas that the owner would like <br />to add insulating house wrap and vinyl siding. The second floor clap -board has a varying 3 %i to 4" reveal. When the mastic <br />siding was removed from this house in 2013, the contractor failed to do the necessary repairs to the clap -board as well as the <br />transitional flashing and trim work. They merely painted the poor areas to match including the flashing and failed trim work. As a <br />result, almost all four corners have sustained damage and rot where the mitered boards meet. There are also areas where flashing <br />ran underneath the old mastic siding now remains and actually collects water and allows it to run under the clap -board or even <br />roofing material instead. I entered the third floor attic and noticed daylight through many of the loose and damaged cedar shake. <br />Although the shake itself was in a repairable condition, the transitions are loose, rotted, and would need to be replaced. The <br />owner expressed a desire to replace both levels as the new siding would be able to transition in a way that the elements would <br />flow more fluidly over it. The shakes would have to be removed and reinstalled with new wood transitional trim work that would <br />consist of several "stepping" levels of trim. The rear of the house has a cement steps/landing from a since removed lean-to <br />storage area and a set of cement steps at rear door. The owner proposes to butt up to the existing steps/landing and continue with <br />a wood deck that will sit flush in height and sit in between the support posts of the second level deck and the house. He also <br />suggests matching the upper deck by using the same lumber and railings on the lower deck. The current stairs/landings lack <br />handrails and railings which the owner plans to rectify as part of the new deck. <br />STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: <br />II. EXISTING STRUCTURES <br />A. BUILDING MATERIALS <br />Original exterior wall materials in the District include brick, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles and masonry block. In some <br />instances, vinyl or aluminum siding has been applied over the original material. <br />Required <br />Original exterior building materials shall be retained. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning <br />and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors and eaves should be retained or replaced by <br />replicas of the same design and materials when deteriorated beyond repair. Masonry including brick and stucco shall be cleaned <br />only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains, and shall be done with a method acceptable for the preservation of <br />the surface: i.e. low pressure water and soft natural bristle brushes. When repairing stucco, only appropriate stucco mixture shall <br />be used. <br />Recommended <br />Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. Metal or vinyl may be used as an alternative to <br />maintaining or replacing the original surface material when it resembles the original surface material. When used over wood <br />surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the original wood. Every effort should be made to retain the original <br />trim around windows, doors, cornices, gables, eaves and other architectural features. Ample ventilation must be afforded the <br />structure when aluminum or vinyl is to be installed in order to prevent increased deterioration of the structure from moisture <br />and/or insects. Mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems or when sufficient mortar is <br />missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, <br />method of application and joint profile. <br />Prohibited <br />Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with material such as artificial stone, brick veneer, asbestos or asphalt shingles, which is <br />inappropriate or was unavailable when the building was constructed. Sandblasting or the use of harsh detergents shall not be used <br />on masonry or stucco. This method of cleaning erodes the surface material and accelerates deterioration. <br />Not Recommended <br />Waterproof or water repellent coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry surfaces unless <br />required to solve a specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are frequently unnecessary and expensive, and <br />can accelerate deterioration of the masonry. Mortar joints which do not need repointing should not be. Repointing should not be <br />done with mortar of high Portland cement content, which can often create a bond that is stronger than the building materials. This <br />can cause deterioration as a result of the differing porosity of the material and the mortar — the end result being serious damage to <br />adjacent brick. Paint should not be removed from masonry surfaces indiscriminately. <br />C. WINDOWS AND DOORS <br />2 <br />