Laserfiche WebLink
Riley: The frames... <br />Enderle: Well inside yes, but outside, I mean ... it would be repainted by the whole rest is not <br />painted it remains the same. I certainly would consider that particularly ... the windows, the <br />sashes themselves are in need of repair including paint but around the sashes is not so bad. <br />Riley: Ok. <br />Sassano: I have a question that may be too technical; I don't know if you know the answer. <br />Are you going to be using the 15/16s sash or the 13/4s? The Magnum is the 13/4. <br />Enderle: It's not the Magnum. <br />Sassano: Not the Magnum. Did you get the cost for the Magnum? <br />Enderle: It's about $150.00 more. <br />Sassano: Per window. <br />Enderle: That might be necessaryfor the ones that are bigger windows, now we're just <br />talking about those four windows that are in the bay. <br />Sassano: Which are about 3 x 7, or just about? <br />Enderle: They are, you know, for instance, there is a big window on the west side of the <br />dining room. That would need (unintelligible). <br />Klusczinski: Professor what is the thickness of the existing windows now? <br />Enderle: The thickness....? <br />Klusczinski: Of the sash. <br />Enderle: The sash.... <br />Hostetler: I believe that it's I and 3116s. <br />Sassano: Oh, so it's thin? I don't think that it's that thin. <br />Hostetler: We checked it. <br />Sassano: That's thin. <br />Several conversations muddled the recording. <br />Enderle: And that is really not a problem if you retrofit the second glass. I'm not sure if <br />Mr. Schoberg mentioned it or someone else, that it would be too heavy. <br />Unknown speaker: Could be. <br />Sassano: Where will you store them? <br />Enderle: In the basement, I have a big room which is close to the heating, so it will be a <br />good temperature. <br />Sassano: I just wanted to make sure that it's not out in the garage. <br />Enderle: No, it's in the house. <br />Klusczinski: Anyother questions for the petitioner? Hearing none, Chair opens discussion <br />among Commissioners. I did have something that I wanted to share. There was some <br />communication that I was engaging in with the state historic preservation organization, <br />David Duvall in particular, some of you might know him. I'll read an email that he wrote <br />regarding this case `...specifically with regard to the Anderson house, since this house is <br />of a rare type and rated Outstanding in the survey, presumably individually eligible for the <br />National Register, and with unique window details, radiused heads, etc., replacement <br />windows would necessarily need to be custom built. Without knowing the level of <br />deterioration, one may presume from the status of the house and its period that they were <br />made from old growth hardwoods. Therefore an equivalent material available today would <br />be premium wood such as mahogany or cypress. Currently harvest poplar wouldn't be <br />sufficiently durablefor such an application. Given those considerations, it's difficult to <br />believe that replacement would constitute an economical alternative to repair unless the <br />existing windows are profoundly defective. Relative merits of insulated glass, presumed for <br />replacement vs. single pane glass with a storm window, become very (unintelligible) or <br />scientific but generally favor the latter. Especially when long term maintenance is <br />considered. ' <br />Sassano: Could you repeat that last sentence again Tim, I'm sorry. <br />Klusczinski: Yes, Relative merits of insulated glass, presumed for replacement vs. single <br />pane glass with a storm window, become very (unintelligible) or scientific but generally <br />3 <br />