My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
October 2007
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2007
>
October 2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:17 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:13:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001361
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Application Number: COA# 2007-0905A <br />Property Location: 710 Park Avenue <br />Property Owner: Georges Enderle <br />Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, Chapin Park LHD/NR <br />Rating: Outstanding <br />STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE/HISTORIC CONTEXT: This Eclectic Italianate was built for <br />Mary Chapin Anderson and Andrew Anderson between 1875 and 1877. Four generations of the <br />Anderson-DuShane family lived in this house until 1962. <br />APPLICATION ITEMS: For Comparative purpose: Restoration on one window (one glass) in bay area <br />of dining room. Replacement of one window (two glasses), next to restored window with Marvin <br />Window (wood ultimate insert double hung window). This proposal will allow to compare the <br />aesthetical and thermal impact of the restoration solution and the replacement solution and provide <br />valuable information for the how the window problem in my house can be solved satisfactorily. <br />Standards and Guidelines for Chapin Park: II Existing Structures, C Windows and Doors: Please see <br />attached pages 74 and 75 of the Chapin Park Standards and Guidelines for the verbatim Standards <br />concerning windows. <br />GROUP B LANDMARK STANDARDS B. Treatment: Treatment shall be defined as any change of <br />surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include reproofing, <br />glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the <br />character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its <br />environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the <br />landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of <br />Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character <br />and style consistency with the original surfaces. <br />RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this experiment. The two window applications <br />will be side by side under nearly identical conditions on the west side of the bay and will not be visible <br />from the street. <br />Sporleder: Excuse me, I've just finally read this, and I don't believe that this is a correct <br />statement, I don't believe that this is on the West side. I think it's on the North side. Sorry Amy, I <br />didn't see that before. <br />Herdman: You don't need to apologize tome. <br />Sporleder: I know that you said that if there was information that needed corrected... <br />Herdman: No ma'am, just on the minutes. <br />DeFrees: Alan Defrees, 18333 Gardenia Drive. I'm here for Dr. Enderle because I teach at <br />Notre Dame and I teach in the school of Architecture, and there are two main interests that I <br />have. I teach students that are involved with the energy concerns of buildings, and the other is <br />that I'm starting to work with the Historic Preservation concentration also. Historic <br />Preservation has been an interest of mine for decades, since I got into architecture. In fact I got <br />into architecture remembering visiting my grandmother and walking down the street and seeing <br />historic homes in the neighborhood. One of the greatest concerns that I have is that in our future <br />we're going to have to have energy efficient buildings. Fortypercent of our primary energy used <br />is in our buildings. And so we're using a tremendous amount of energy, while making great <br />progress in areas of transportation and agriculture and industry. With buildings we have this <br />huge problem regarding making them energy efficient. There's a lot about old buildings is good. <br />Lots of windows meant opening windows and not relying on air conditioning to remain <br />comfortable_ Today -many <br />people are still going to AC to do that, but our future is going to have <br />to determine how to keep windows operable so that we can use them throughout many seasons <br />and how we can work towards having an energy efficient building. I'm here pro-bono and not <br />charging anyone for this because part of the interest of this is that the scientific facts are pretty <br />easy to sort out, but this area of decision of when we're altering a building to it's detriment is of <br />real concern tome. What Professor Enderle is proposing, initially he wanted to change the four <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.