My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
November 2007
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2007
>
November 2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:17 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:13:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001361
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Smith: The slates you see, you're only seeing half of the tile. Slates are typically 18x12, <br />what you do is divide that and then subtract two, so you have your head lap and your <br />exposure. <br />Sporleder: So you're fixing the individual slates here and there by placing the shields <br />underneath them as it fits in. The notion of spot doing what you're doing and getting the ice <br />shield and whatnot underneath here and there, I don't' understand how that works. <br />Klusczinski: Are you compelled by Code to install ice shield when you're doing a repair? <br />Smith: Yes. <br />Klusczinski: Ok, does that answer part of your question? <br />Sporleder: Not really, but that's ok. <br />Smith: Ice and water shield is really... <br />Sporleder: I know what it is. <br />Smith: It's a definite need on a roof like that. <br />Sporleder: So eventually you're going to use all new slate? Start from scratch basically and <br />restructure tear off whatever it is you've just now done? Are you going to use new slate or <br />artificial or what? <br />Smith: I'll use new slate, and will be able to re -use the ones that I've used for these <br />temporaryfixes. They're veryfragile, and very brittle and can just crumble in your hands. <br />Sporleder: So the original slate is eventually just going to be taken off and thrown away? <br />Smith: Right. <br />Sporleder: Ok, I understand now. <br />Hostetler: I think that what you're dealing with is an in-kind replacement. The reason why it <br />came to the Commission was due to the asphalts replacing the slates. As that's no longer an <br />issue, this is basically an in-kind replacement and repair. <br />Klusczinski: Right. And a future C ofA will come to us when they're ready to do the entire <br />roof because this is a temporary component. <br />Hostetler: We could staff approve that because that's essentially a complete tear off and re - <br />roof with exactly the same materials. <br />Riley: If you get the money, you're going to do a complete tear off and re -roof? <br />Smith: Yes. <br />Sporleder: The first thing that we were dealing with was the round, turret area, but there's <br />still the whole church to be dealt with, is that going to be done that way? <br />Klusczinski: The C ofA is for all emergency damage to be repaired. <br />Smith: All emergency damage will be repaired and to say I can go out and do that in one <br />time would be ludicrous. It takes a little patience and a lot of time. <br />Klusczinski: Shawn, a legal question as this is an in-kind replacement, are we obligated to <br />offer public hearing on this? I'm just trying to expedite it for the purpose of this meeting. <br />Peterson: No, you don't have to. <br />Klusczinski: Very good. <br />Sporleder: Just for your information, I have tried to find the original blueprints and <br />drawings for the building, but so far they haven't turned up. I need to go down in the church <br />vault and rummage around in all that stuff and see what I can rummage out. <br />Herdman: It would save time and money on the building assessment. <br />Klusczinski: Anyone brave enough to motion? <br />Patrick: I'll motion. I move that we approve 2007-0904 regarding 101 S Lafayette/302 W <br />Washington local landmark. <br />Riley: Second. <br />Klusczinski: And your motion was to amend the continuance? <br />Patrick: es. _ - - <br />- - - - --- <br />Klusczinski: Because the original C ofA has been changed since last month. And Linda <br />you're seconding the amended.... <br />Riley: Yes. <br />Peterson: And does the applicant consent to the amendment? <br />Greene: Yes. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.