Laserfiche WebLink
Sporleder:... That we approve application number 2006-1108-A at 710 Park Avenue with the <br />added addendum that the existing windows be removed and carefully stored forfuture reuse if <br />somebody so desires to do so. <br />Peterson: I'd like to comment that if a condition is placed upon the approval, then the applicant <br />must consent to that prior to the motion being approved. So you'd have to ask the applicant if <br />they're willing to do that prior to the vote. <br />Sporleder: Would the applicant be agreeable to storing, carefully removing and storing the <br />existing windows? <br />Enderle: Yes. <br />Sporleder: Thank you. <br />Patrick: We have a motion on the table, do we have a second? <br />Riley: Second. <br />Patrick: We will now vote on the motion on the table. All in favor? <br />Sporleder: I vote aye. <br />Zeiger: Do a roll call. <br />Patrick: We'll do a roll call vote please. <br />Sporleder: Aye, this is Joann. <br />Choitz: I'm negative on it, and my reasons are very clear. The house is beyond the ordinary, and <br />it's a very special place, and many of the things that we've heard here this evening about other <br />kinds of windows and things being put on these houses were done when there was no local <br />landmark or local history, or local district here. Now its an entirely different thing. We are the <br />keepers of the fabric of those houses, and its to remain as simple and pure, and of course they <br />were made by people that didn't have the use of tools that we have now, and that is my reason, <br />the house deserves a better chance to go on into its second hundred years without any more <br />damage to it than is absolutely necessary. <br />Patrick: Thank you. <br />Riley: I vote aye, Linda Riley. <br />Patrick: I Lynn Patrick, President of the Commission, vote nay. I think that its inappropriate for <br />an outstanding local landmark, I think that it goes against the standards. Having viewed these <br />windows personally, I think that there are other solutions that there are other solutions than <br />what's been presented. I believe that this would be a detriment to the house and to the <br />neighborhood. And I find that the hardship to the client to be minimal if any. So sayeth I. <br />Klusczinski: I vote to deny Certificate of Appropriateness, Tim Klusczinski, 2006-1108-A with <br />amendments. The Anderson House is a premier and significant Local Landmark in the Chapin <br />Park Historic District. Presently, the 50 plus windows of the original 1870 vintage compliment, <br />remain intact, and contribute to the charm and historic value of the entire structure. According <br />to "The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows " Preservation Brief no.9 - issued by the US <br />Secretary of the Interior and National Park Service -Technical Preservation Services, and relating <br />to historic properties and windows, "After all of the factors have been evaluated (these are, <br />"admitting light to the interior spaces, providing fresh air and ventilation to the interior, <br />providing a visual link to the outside world, and enhancing the appearance of a building'), <br />"windows should be considered significant to a building if they: I) are original, 2) reflect the <br />original design intent for the building, 3) reflect period or regional styles or building practices, <br />4) reflect changes to the building resultingfrom major periods or events, or 5) are examples of <br />exceptional craftsmanship or design. " So then, I conclude that the Anderson windows are worthy <br />of this consideration. As a result, extreme care should be taken for changes and modifications <br />that could potentially impact the structure or its parts and, as a result, affect its historic or <br />market appeal. The Anderson House together with its original components is becoming more <br />valuable with age — but only while important components (like windows) continue to compliment <br />its stately presence. Environmental conditions relating to the application can be address by <br />restoration in lieu of replacement. Resetting and re-glazing the panes would significantly reduce <br />air infiltration to create a more comfortable living space. In addition, storm windows would <br />increase the thermal insulation value and could potentially exceed the life and performance of the <br />proposed double, Argon-filled panes. <br />10 <br />