My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
December 2006
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2006
>
December 2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:17 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:12:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001361
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
deteriorating the woodwork on the inside, because it must be removed every year, and it's taking <br />off the finish. There is no real appropriate place on the inside to install an interior storm. <br />Patrick: Joann? <br />Sporleder: I'm notfinished. <br />Patrick: Ok, I was just going to ask if you were finished. <br />Sporleder: No, I'm taking a breath. I'm trying to take a breath here. And I appreciate what Tim <br />and Catherine and other members of the Commission have tried very hard to keep this <br />extraordinarily fine structure in as pristine a condition as possible. But the pristine condition <br />means single pane glass, and that is very difficult to live with. Furthermore, I think that no <br />overall harm could come to this structure, nor to the neighbors, not to the integrity of the <br />neighborhood by allowing the use of insulating glass in the way it has been proposed to do using <br />the Marvin windows. Furthermore, I find it extremely interesting in looking at the overall <br />definition of what is or isn't appropriate and what exists in the neighborhood, there are already, <br />by the records here, 50% of the houses in that neighborhood already have aluminum storm <br />windows of one kind or another. A fair number of those are also insulated glass, aluminum clad <br />illuminated, not illuminated, insulating glass. And the standards which refer to these 50% wood <br />windows, 50% aluminum windows, make no allowance for those structures which have no storm <br />windows of any kind whatsoever. So, I don't see that allowing aluminum clad, wood thermal pane <br />windows which absolutely replicate what is already there in appearance is so drastically awful <br />for the neighborhood, or for the house itself. I guess that's what I want to say and thank you very <br />much and thanks to everyone for the enormous amount of dedication that they have put to this <br />effort. <br />Patrick: It's now 10 minutes. I misspoke when I initiated this portion Joann, and that is my fault. <br />I meant to recognize Commissioners with questions for the staff or for the property owner. At <br />this point does anyone have a question for the staff, because I have one question? <br />Zeiger: I have a question when you're done. <br />Patrick: Very good. <br />Zeiger: Is it to my understanding that there is going to be a second window sill installed with this <br />installation? <br />Sporleder: May I speak to that? <br />Zeiger: No, I'm asking the petitioner or staff. My understanding from your presentation is that <br />you're installing a second window sill on top of the existing window sill. In other words are you <br />replacing the sash or the entire jamb unit with a new sill on top? <br />Enderle: Its an insert which means it's a frame. <br />Zeiger: Ok, you answered my question. And I've also understood that there's no historic <br />evidence of storms, is there any evidence that there's been aluminum cladding ever put on this <br />building historically? <br />Enderle: No. <br />Zeiger: I think that's all of my questions. <br />Patrick: I have one quick question for Wayne. In your opinion Wayne, is there another solution <br />other than the one, not to go into great detail, but there is another solution other than the one that <br />has been presented to us in this Certificate of Appropriateness. In your professional opinion, as <br />someone who has attended workshops on historic structures, windows etc, there is a different <br />solution, but it has not been presented? <br />Doolittle: Well, you can add, or you can replace those windows ... I believe that the sashes can be <br />replaced, just the sashes. To fill the same space and with a change of weights on it, if you're <br />using a spring loaded weight then you can accommodate a dual pane glass. It would mean <br />taking out the existing sashes, top and bottom, and replacing them with wood sashes that would <br />also have the dual pane glass on it. You can accommodate the difference in weight by using a <br />different type of pulley system. It would accommodate that weight. <br />Patrick: Thank you. <br />Enderle: May I say something to that solution? We discussed that proposal also, and the <br />problem with that solution is that my windows are not square. And if you have just trim (?) liners <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.