My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
December 2006
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2006
>
December 2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:17 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:12:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001361
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
and reused in place as well as the use of aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of <br />original windows and doors. <br />Patrick: The Chair recognizes the homeowner if he wishes to approach the podium and make <br />any statements. Please limit your comments to five minutes. <br />Enderle: Yes, good evening ladies and gentlemen. First of all, I would like to begin with <br />thanking you for your support that you have provided me over the last four months. Particularly <br />the dedication and perseverance in the search for an appropriate solution for my window <br />problems. I would like to thank particularly those that came to my house last time to have a first <br />hand look at my windows and to discuss what we can find as a solution. And also my thanks go <br />to Martha Choitz who recommended Marvin Windows. I considered it seriously, I contacted <br />Marvin Windows, and I had a meeting with Bruce Darr, representing Marvin Windows, Joann <br />Sporleder, and my contractor at my house. I see the following options- it is true that the existing <br />windows can be restored, but they are single pane glass windows. But they are not thermally <br />efficient, they are cold. It is not possible to install exterior storm windows because my house <br />never had that, and it is technically not feasible to do that. It's not possible to have interior storm <br />windows because that would change the character of the room and would look a little bit like a <br />prison. What I have done last year, and what I have done this winter is to stretch plastic over the <br />windows, which works but is definitely not the definitive answer, and it costs about $20 per <br />window. I also have consulted with an architect to find out what we can do, and I also have <br />consulted with Dr. Robert Rodes who is a neighbor and a professor of Law at the University of <br />Notre Dame. Now my solution which I am proposing here are Marvin Windows, double hung, all <br />wood, two glasses, the color matches the existing paint. I also asked Bruce Darr if that window <br />can be repainted and he confirmed that. So, from outside, there is no change at all. I'm also <br />willing to salvage the windows because I know that they are of quality, and I have a safe place in <br />my basement where I can store them and so I would like to submit my proposal and ask you for <br />consideration and understanding. <br />Patrick: Thank you. You may sit down or remain standing if you wish, but the President will <br />now recognize Commissioners with questions for the Staff or property owner, not to exceed five <br />minutes. Any Commissioners? <br />Peterson: Madame President I just wanted to acknowledge that because this is a new Certificate <br />of Appropriateness, any evidence submitted at the prior hearings will not be considered unless <br />one of the Commissioners or the applicant wants to submit the minutes from those prior meetings <br />as evidence. I know that at the last meeting there was a site visit and it seems that evidence was <br />submitted into the record for that, so if the Commissioners want to do that again they can do that, <br />or ask that the minutes once approved be submitted into the record. <br />Patrick: Thank you esteemed counselor. I was not referencing any prior, um on my revised <br />parliamentary procedure that I've been trying to follow that and our other one it's a 15 minute <br />maximum so we've always traditionally started out at S with the understanding that we can go <br />longer if necessary. Do any Commissioners have questions? <br />Sporleder: I would like to pickup on what Counsel has suggested. I would like to make the <br />motion that the minutes of all of the previous meetings be admitted as evidence for this particular <br />hearing. I make that as a motion. <br />Peterson: I think that you can make that a motion once they're approved to do that. Otherwise <br />the applicant or any Commissioner can submit it to evidence with their comments too. It does <br />need to be a formal action to do it. <br />Sporleder: Ok. Thank you. <br />Patrick: Do we have a second on that motion? <br />Riley: Second. <br />Patrick: All in favor? (Ayes are heard) Let's do a roll call vote. <br />Sporleder: Joann, aye. <br />Choitz: I'm not voting. <br />Riley: Linda, aye. <br />Patrick: I'm not voting either. <br />Klusczinski: Tim Klusczinski, nay. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.