Laserfiche WebLink
Lynn Patrick: Right, well on the right hand column are pretty much ad -hoc committees but if you <br />look on the left hand we've got Historic Districts, Standards and Maintenance, FaVade <br />Easements, Landmarks, Budget and Finance, Legal and Executive... <br />Mary Jane Chase: Yeah, but if you meet, say, twice a year and then you try to do this every <br />month, what do you talk about? <br />Todd Zeiger: I think we just....I appreciate your efforts trying to get the committees to meet but I <br />think that we should just continue to put the reminders in front of the chairs and let us call the <br />meetings as necessary. I just think if you meet before the meeting, you just end up discussing <br />what you're going to discuss at this meeting and you're just going to roll everybody into the next <br />room and have the same meeting again. I see it at City Council all the time. It's really kind of a <br />waste. <br />Lynn Patrick: Well good, I'm glad. That's why I wanted to put this out for discussion. <br />Todd Zeiger: We can go back in the back room and have a meeting of all the committees and <br />then come out here and report to the public, I just see it as a duplicate... <br />Lynn Patrick: I don't want to do that. <br />Todd Zeiger: You just need to keep reminding us chairs to get our butts together and have a <br />meeting and now that we have fellow committee members we can now have a meeting. <br />Lynn Patrick: That's what I want. I don't want to set something up that's not going to work. <br />I've been thinking about this as I talk about it. But I do think that having us all meet about the <br />advisory committee, I think that's very important. If that's what comes out of this, that's what I <br />wanted, that's the important thing. <br />Todd Zeiger: The sub committees need to have at least an organizational get together with their <br />members if there's no other business to report back to the commission if that's the case. I would <br />resist putting together a standing meeting right now and instead report as needed. <br />Linda Riley: Could you possibly advertise when the committees will meet during the year, and <br />then if anybody from the community is interested in being involved and hearing what they had to <br />say to call the office andfind out when they're meeting? Then that would be a publication for the <br />whole year then we could go ahead and meet. <br />Shawn Peterson: The way it has to be is that you can set up a regular meeting date and do that <br />once a year as far as a regular meeting time. And then, you'd have to hold to that then basically <br />cancel them all and you can do that and you've basically met your requirement. I think it could <br />be solution here if you decide to move the meeting up to 7:00 or 6:00 or whatever, you could <br />always publish that there's a meeting and if there's nothing to do, the meeting could be cancelled <br />due to nothing to do that way its always there as a blocked out time frame where you could meet. <br />And then say if you had something like a particularly difficult certificate of appropriateness that <br />was referred to committee, that committee then in a sense could meet at the same time as this <br />meeting and do like they do in Council which is go to the committee of the whole. You just go to <br />the first committee, they do their vote, and then the next meeting the committee makes its <br />recommendation formalized- there's two routes you can do with itj think either one is <br />acceptable. <br />Mary Jane Chase: The question that I have is if you look at these committees if you publicize <br />them and people don't understand what they are perhaps let's take Landmarks and people don't <br />understand what is a landmark, you don't know what landmarks are you can have people coming <br />and asking questions, and that could take hours. And off the wall questions, you know, about <br />buildings and the committee is not prepared to get into a lot of detail. Maybe Landmarks is <br />working on a specific landmark, but to say that it's a public meeting for the public to attend and <br />to throw all of these questions... <br />Shawn Peterson: You'll have that, no matter when they meet its going to be a public meeting. It <br />doesn't mean you have to allow the public to speak. So ... they can be there, and have the <br />opportunity to see you meet and whatever else, and then they'll leave. They'll say 7 want to <br />speak' and you'll say 'You're out of order'. Just be sure that the agenda does not provide a <br />privilege of the floor. <br />Mary Jane Chase: Would you advertise that as a non - comment meeting because... <br />Shawn Peterson: No, just a normal meeting. <br />10 <br />