My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
August 2005
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2005
>
August 2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:16 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:11:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001360
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
which she operates or a project she operates; because, if we don't the way she wants to go <br />at it we could have problems. <br />JULIE SCHUTTE: There is a different approach or a different way in which the <br />commission can explain its decision in those types of cases for approving or possibly <br />approving a synthetic siding going on top of the original; because of the possible monies <br />that need to be spent on the interiors to bring them back to single family dwellings. I <br />think that the commission has a reasonable explanation for the exceptions to their policies <br />for them restoring the siding on the exterior. It seems to me in that area of the district <br />what is more important - -the exterior or actually getting stable single - family housing. It <br />would be lovely to have their exteriors historically accurate and restored; but I think that <br />the commission could find a way to phrase it so that the neighborhood understands why. <br />BOB YAPP: I am going to ask the commission to be very careful about this. <br />Consistency on historic preservation commissions is absolutely critical to maintain <br />credibility in the community. I found this to be true with all the commissions I have <br />worked with throughout Northern Indiana and throughout my entire career. If a <br />community development corporation wants to do some houses in a local historic district; <br />then they should not be doing anything different than what everyone else is doing; <br />especially in Chapin Park. My experience and being in the neighborhood next to Chapin <br />Park; Chapin Park is over the hump. Chapin Park is not like the Cottage Grove area <br />where I live where we are not even close to the hump. Private development is what is <br />going to finish turning Chapin Park around, not non - for -profit organizations going in and <br />doing low and moderate income housing. Our central city neighborhoods have no <br />economic diversity because we're packing all of this low and moderate income housing <br />into our central city neighborhoods. It's economic bigotry in a sense; because, you are <br />looking at the fact that everything is being packed into one area and it is all low to <br />moderate income. We need to start attracting middle to upper middle income families as <br />well as quality low and moderate income families into the neighborhoods instead. That <br />part of the central city, the Chapin Park Neighborhood, is not in need of HUD based low <br />and moderate income housing programs. With HUD regulations being totally anti - <br />preservation and promoting vinyl siding and promoting vinyl windows; it's our <br />organization's belief and hope that the commission will not make any exceptions for this <br />organization going into a brand new local historic district. There was a comment made <br />about the authenticity of the exterior; that's the most important part of a historic district. <br />I don't care if they decimate the inside of the property; you have no purview over that. I <br />want people to retain the architectural integrity and the interiors of their homes, but the <br />most critical part is the visual of the neighborhood. I am urging you that whatever your <br />standards are for that neighborhood that you don't adjust them for one organization. <br />D. STAFF REPORTS <br />1. C of A Approvals; Correspondence <br />JULIE SCHUTTE: (Refer to white copy of staff approved certificates of <br />appropriateness in meeting binder). <br />A. Director's Report <br />JULIE SCHUTTE: (Refer to yellow copy of director's report in meeting binder). <br />B. Assistant Director's Report <br />JULIE SCHUTTE: (Refer to white copy of assistant director's report in meeting <br />binder). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.