Laserfiche WebLink
a school house supposedly listed at the corner of Tulip and Fillmore Road. The school house is <br />listed in only one of the books and is not listed on the map. I drove by that area and I don't recall <br />seeing the school house. I have made a methodical drive through every country road trying to <br />match these addresses up some how. I am using the existing records and pictures to help me <br />also. I will eventually get through the whole county. <br />JOHN OXIAN: The reason why that survey is called "interim" is because the state wanted this <br />information right away. When we sent the state this information, I left it open as interim because <br />I knew there were a number of mistakes that had been made in this survey. The year stated on <br />the survey is not right because there have been only two county surveys done, one was in 1975 <br />and the other one was done the other day. The only thing that this survey did was make <br />corrections over time. Since the first survey was done in 1975, you are going to find a lot of <br />things missing between 1975 and the last survey that you did. In that book there should be <br />bigger maps with that which the Westerly Group sent that should help you. Instead of using that <br />book you should use the bigger maps and Rhonda should tell you where they are and then you <br />can use those instead. What Rhonda did was she took from the bigger maps and reduced them <br />and put them in that book. <br />WAYNE DOOLITTLE: I did find one house that we haven't followed up on yet that I thought <br />was rather interesting. It was on Earley Road. We have two houses that are listed on Earley <br />Road, but this house is not listed on Earley Road and it is definitely an older structure with <br />original shutters on it. I also noticed that this structure is in very bad shape. I could not find it <br />listed in any of my other reference materials. The structure is located in the 33000 block. <br />IV. HEARING OF VISITORS (No visitors spoke at this time) <br />V. OLD BUSINESS <br />1. Enforcement Ordinances and Procedures <br />KAREN HAMMOND -NASH: I was directed by the commission at our last meeting to inquire <br />of Kathy Davis whether she would be willing to support a proposal that the enforcement matters <br />be heard by their hearing officer. Mrs. Davis called me to say that while in principle she would <br />have no objection that it would be absolutely unworkable at the present time because their <br />budget and their contract with their hearing officer pays him to do approximately half the work <br />that he is actually doing. It is in his contract that he is to hear no more than eight cases per <br />afternoon when he comes into these hearings. He in fact does 16 or 20 hearings instead and the <br />department does not have the budget to pay him for the additional hearings that he does. The <br />department also does not have a budget for an additional transcriptionist or recorder. I also do <br />not know how much the department pays him. <br />JOHN OXIAN: What you should do then is find out what they pay him because as I can <br />imagine now, I doubt whether we would have one or two hearings down there a year. What we <br />have to do is find out what the cost is because in all the years that I have been sitting here on the <br />commission, I can only think of two or three times we would have had to go before a hearing <br />officer before we went to court which we hardly ever did anyway. <br />N <br />