Laserfiche WebLink
138 RICHARD MORRISON: What happens if the Commission tables the application <br />139 and it does not come up on next month's agenda? <br />140 <br />141 CHERYL GREENE: Under the ordinance if the commission does. not <br />142 take action within sixty days of receiving the application, without obtaining a <br />143 waiver, it is automatically approved. It would be an approval by default. As of now <br />144 the applicant has waived the statutory time limit until today. <br />145 <br />146 RICHARD MORRISON: Canthe Commission move to table the application and <br />147 not have it on next months agenda so it is approved with out the Commission's <br />148 endorsement? <br />149 <br />150 CHERYL GREENE: The application would automatically be placed <br />151 on the next agenda. <br />152 <br />153 RICHARD MORRISON: What if the applicant does not sign the waiver? <br />154 <br />155 CHERYL GREENE: If the applicant does not waive the statutory time <br />156 limit and the Commission chooses to table the issue then it will not make its way <br />157 back onto the agenda. <br />158 <br />159 RICHARD MORRISON: If that occurs it will protect the Commission from <br />160 future liability. <br />161 <br />162 MARTHA CHOITZ: I don't think such an action would protect the <br />163 Commission. I think a denial with a stipulation would be very clear and would <br />164 better block any future actions from the state. It would also put the Commission on <br />165 record showing the application was not approved. <br />166 <br />167 CHERYL GREENE: The only question I cannot answer at this time is <br />168 whether or not the Building Department would have to force the removal of the <br />169 lights because they cannot issue a permit with obtaining a Certificate of <br />170 Appropriateness from this Commission. <br />171 <br />172 RICHARD MORRISON: I think the intent is clear, we want to protect the <br />173 Commission with out creating extra cost to the project. I move that the application <br />174 be tabled to allow Mrs. Greene time to research the correct path for the <br />175 Commission to take to reach its desired end result. <br />176 <br />177 JOANN SPORLEDER: I second the motion. <br />-178 - - <br />179 MARY JANE CHASE: Do we have a cost comparison for removal of the lights <br />180 and the amount of money the project may loss. <br />181 <br />182 JOANN SPORLEDER: No, the Commission does not know if any money would <br />183 be lost in the first place. <br />11 <br />