Laserfiche WebLink
ANGELA BOULEVARD BRIDGE <br />ST. JOSEPH COUNTY BRIDGE 211 <br />OVER ST. JOSEPH RIVER <br />SECTION 106 COORDINATION <br />Section 106 Coordination began with Early Coordination Letters (documentation) sent to twenty - <br />five review agencies on June 1, 2001 with a request for responses by August 1, 2001. Historic <br />resource agencies sent such documentation and asked to comment were: <br />Historic Preservation Commission <br />John Oxian <br />Historic Landmarks Foundation of Indiana <br />Todd Zeiger <br />Northern Indiana Historical Society <br />Cheryl Taylor <br />St. Joseph County Historian <br />Mary Renshaw <br />Society for the Preservation of Old Mills, Mishawaka <br />Fred Beals <br />Historic New Carlisle <br />Susan Spier <br />Osceola Historic Society <br />Wendy Kelver- Sheets <br />Michiana Jewish Historical Society <br />Roger Birdsell <br />As part of Early Coordination, we have received responses from the first three historic resource <br />agencies (letters attached) and have had phone conversations with representatives of Historic <br />Landmarks Foundation of Indiana and the staff of the Historic Preservation Commission. The <br />following outline lists recommendations from these two agencies (in italics) and our response. <br />1. Renderings of the proposed bridge indicated that the proposed floor beams were one less <br />in number per span as the original bridge. The aspect is important to the historic <br />interests and we would like to see the same number and placement. <br />We have reviewed this matter and have concluded that we can modify our <br />placement of the beams to reflect the same number and the basic symmetry of the <br />existing bridge. There is not adequate room at the crown of the arch in each <br />span to place the floorbeam; however, we can provide an architectural treatment <br />at this location that will look like the other floorbeams from the outside. The <br />adjacent floorbeams will be 9 feet apart and this will be adequate to support the <br />total slab span of 18 feet. We will place floorbeams at the piers in a position <br />close to the original. Each span will be symmetrical and contain the same number <br />of beams as presently exists. Design plans will be modified to reflect this request. <br />2. The Commission staff asked if the existing railing on the bridge could_ be salvaged and <br />re -used in the rehabilitation of Angela Boulevard Bridge? <br />The existing railing is a concrete railing, which was tied to the slab with <br />reinforcing steel. The contractor must remove the entire slab as well as the <br />floorbeams because of their deteriorated condition. Being made of reinforced <br />concrete, they could not be easily removed, protected from damage during the <br />removal process and reinstalled into the new slab. Consequently once the slab is <br />poured, new railing will be placed. The decorative rail that we are proposing is <br />the Railing Type TX, which has passed the crash tests at the Texas <br />Transportation Institute and as such is allowed by FHWA (Federal Highway <br />