Laserfiche WebLink
231 <br />232 B. 2000-0810 —112 S. Lafayette, roof lighting. <br />233 <br />234 RHONDA SAUNDERS: The reading of the history of this particular structure has <br />235 been read into the minutes at previous meetings and thus will not be read tonight. <br />236 <br />237 SCOTT ROZANSKI: I am Scott Rozanski of Herceg & Associates. I am here to <br />238 request that the monumental lighting be approved. Other alternative lighting fixtures <br />239 were looked at as well as other placement. The level of illumination and lighting is <br />240 appropriate. <br />241 <br />242 RICHARD MORRISON: When you say the lighting was recommended, who <br />243 recommended it? <br />244 <br />245 SCOTT ROZANSKI: The lights were recommended by Herceg and Associates to <br />246 address the County Commissioners desire for monumental lighting. <br />247 <br />248 GERALD UJDAK: I would like to recommend that the Chair briefly outline the <br />249 history behind these roof top lights for Mr. Morrison who is new to the board and this <br />250 topic. <br />251 <br />252 CATHERINE HOSTETLER: The lights were thought to have been part of the <br />253 original Certificate of Appropriateness by Herceg and Associates, when in fact they were <br />254 not addressed. Per discussions with Herceg and Associates and our Legal Counsel it was <br />255 determined that the lights had not been approved. However, Herceg and Associates had <br />256 already installed the lights and are now formally applying. <br />257 <br />258 GERALD UJDAK: Herceg and Associates stated in the past that smaller light <br />259 fixtures were seriously considered but some how the larger units ended up being <br />260 installed. <br />261 <br />262 SCOTT ROZANSKI: The larger units were chosen because it would take twice <br />263 as many of the smaller lights to illuminate the top of the cupola versus the four larger <br />264 lights. <br />265 <br />266 JOANN SPORLEDER: I am concerned that any action taken by the Commission <br />267 tonight may or may not affect the state funding. I would request that this application be <br />268 sent down state for comments with special note to any affect it may have on the federal <br />269 funding. <br />270 <br />271 CHERYL GREENE: I did talk to the people in the State Office who have <br />272 decided to leave this issue at the local level and no further comment would be received <br />273 from them. <br />274 <br />275 JOANN SPORLEDER: I would still like a copy to go to the State Office with a <br />276 request for their opinion regarding this issue and the federal funding. <br />