May 2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

47 He stated that Herceg and Associates was officially recommending the use of 150 watt 48 sodium vapor bulb in the acorn style light fixture to allow the appropriate lighting. Mr. 49 Rozanski went on to note that the globe fixture with a 150 watt bulb can be used, but, will 50 leave some areas under lit. Mr. Herceg noted that he had met with Commissioner, 51 Beverly Crone, who stated that if what the Historic Preservation Commission 52 recommends falls with in the guidelines then it will be done. He also asked if the 53 Commission could vote on the streetlight and sconce lighting to allow the project to 54 continue while tabling the roof lights until next month. Mr. Rozanski noted that the 55 sconces proposed for the front door would be identical to the pole lights except for their 56 size, which would be 12 inches. Mr. Oxian asked how bright Mr. Herceg wanted to make 57 the courtyard. Mr. Herceg stated that they were trying to reach the 1.0 candle average 58 and the globe falls short at a .7 average. Mr. Ujdak asked what type of material would be 59 used for the sconces. Mr. Rozanski stated that the white globe only comes in acrylic. 60 Mr. Ujdak asked what type of material would be used for the globes on the poles. Mr. 61 Rozanski stated that if the white globe is available in polycarbonate then that will be 62 used, however if it is not available they will have to use acrylic. 63 64 Mr. Oxian moved to approve eight, fluted 12 foot tall, cast iron poles, with 16 inch 65 diameter white globes, which are to be identical to the wall sconces in style, made of 66 polycarbonate (or acrylic if polycarbonate is not available) and lit by 150 watt sodium 67 vapor bulbs. He also moved to approve recessed lighting in the portico as presented and 68 four wall sconces to be located on either side of the main entrance each to have a 12 inch 69 white globe, number G1278BB with 50 watt sodium vapor bulbs. Mrs. Hostetler 70 seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 71 72 Mr. Oxian stated that the issue concerning the roof lighting would be tabled until May 73 15th to allow Mr. Herceg time to discuss this matter with the State Historic Preservation 74 Office, which has expressed concern over these lights. Mr. Oxian read the letter from the 75 State Office regarding their interest in the changes to the roof of the Courthouse, the 76 funds they have vested in the project and the need for all proposed work to be submitted 77 to the Department of Historic Preservation and Archaeology prior to the beginning of any 78 work. Mr. Herceg stated that he would contact Mr. Kennedy of the DHPA with in the 79 week. 80 81 2.2000-0307, 1601 Kemble, windows & doors. 82 Mr. Oxian waved the presentation of the staff report since this application was before the 83 Commission last month. Mr. Kil stated that all the fire variances that they requested were 84 approved which will allow the applicant to use the plan initially submitted to the 85 Commission. He further noted that exterior details will be retained and almost all 86 windows will be rehabilitated with the exception of two south elevation windows which 87 are proposed for glass block for safety and privacy. Mr. Kil stated that the front entrance 88 bank sign and all terra cotta would be repaired and restored. Mr. Oxian stated that the 89 Commission should approve the application with a motion that states that the glass block 90 is being approved but is not setting a precedent. Mrs. Sporleder stated that by approving 91 the application as submitted gives enough reasons for why the glass block is being 92 permitted. Mrs. DeRose noted that the minutes could indicate the discussion that the