June 1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

There was some clarification over the new plan currently being proposed to the Commission. Mrs. Linder stated that the new plans were fine with her. Mrs. Sporleder asked if the letters of opposition concerned the height of the garage. Mrs. Linder stated that the letters were concerned with the driveway and garage. Mr. Oxian stated that the opposition letters do not need to be read because the conflicting portions of the plan have been removed. Mrs. Sporleder asked if the Certificate of Appropriateness included the fence or not. Mr. Talley stated that it did not. Mrs. Sporleder asked if the fence would be reviewed at a later date. Mr. Talley stated that it would. There was discussion over what should be approved tonight and what should remain in committee until further information is presented. Mr. Talley read through the Certificate of Appropriateness, retaining all requests except the proposal concerning the side yard fence. Mrs. DeRose stated that if Mr. Talley accurately reads the Certificate of Appropriateness as amended the Commission could vote on it now. There was some discussion over if the patio should be added to the certificate or placed into committee. The architect stated that he would have more information concerning the patio and fence at a later date. Mr. Talley asked Mr. Liddell if it was all right with him if the fence and patio were not discussed at this time. Mr. Liddell stated that it would be all right to place those topics into committee. Mrs. Hostetler moved to accept the application as amended in blue prints dated May 17, 1999. Mr. Helmus seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 2. 1999-0428 - 1330 Lincolnway East, business sign. Mr. Talley presented the staff report and circulated photographs. He also noted that the house was owned by the Youth Service Bureau. Mrs. Hostetler moved to approve the application as recommended by staff. Ms. Gallagher seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 3. 1999-0503 - 1115 Riverside Drive, basement window replacement Mr. Talley presented the staff report and circulated photographs. He also noted that the owner, Roger Skurski, was present. Mr. Skurski stated that the windows currently located in the basement are no longer manufactured and that he was unaware of any other alternate replacement product then glass block. He further noted that he was in search of a product that looks good, lets light in and is a deterrent to burglars. Mr. Talley reported that Mr. Skurski has experienced a couple of break-ins over the past couple of years. Mr. Zmyslo asked if the existing windows had steel frames. Mr. Skurski stated that the windows appear to have rusted steal frames. Mr. Talley reported that during an earlier conversation with Mr. Skurski it was agreed upon that the application should be sent to committee to allow a more thorough investigation into other window alternatives. Mr. Oxian stated that he would prefer to see the windows replaced with wood or vinyl windows, rather then glass block. There was some discussion over the difficulty and expense of replacing broken glass block. Mr. Oxian recommended that the application be placed into the Standard and Maintenance Committee. He asked Mr. Skurski if this was acceptable to him. Mr. Skurski stated that it would be fine with him. Mrs. Hostetler moved to place the application into the Standards and Maintenance Committee. Mrs. Sporleder seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. F?