My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
August 1999
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes and Recordings
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 1999
>
August 1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:22 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:09:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001401
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
C. Proiect Descrintion and Timetable <br />Please supply a narrative statement that: <br />I . Provides a detailed description of the project, including the reasons for undertaking the project. For development <br />projects, be sure to include a description of the current building conditions, the specific problems that need to be <br />addressed, and the proposed repairs. <br />2. States the project goals and methodology, and indicates how the project would benefit the State and/or the local <br />community. <br />3. Lists and describes the products that will result from the project (e.g., county survey, National Register historic <br />district nomination including X number of properties, etc.). <br />4. Outlines a proposed time frame for the project that includes both starting and ending dates, as well as a breakdown <br />of any "phases" or major parts of the project. Projects with ending dates later than June 30, 2001 cannot be <br />considered for funding. <br />This narrative should be as clear and concise as possible, and should include adequate detail to fully define the proposed <br />scope of work. In most cases, however, this narrative should not exceed three (3) pages. <br />D. Statements on Meeting State Priorities <br />Attached you will find two different lists of priorities which the State has identified to help evaluate proposed grant <br />projects. The priorities are based on federal requirements and recommendations, the Division's own established needs <br />and plans, and public input from constituents throughout the state. It is critical that applicants prepare thorough <br />responses to BOTH the Administrative Priorities and the Architectural and Historical Priorities when completing <br />the application. The responses to these sets of priorities are what the DHPA Staff uses to evaluate and score your <br />proposal. Without clearly detailed and thorough responses, your proposal may not score high enough to receive <br />grant funding. <br />Please contact the DHPA if there is any uncertainty regarding the specific priorities that are applicable to your project. <br />It is unlikely that any single project will address every priority. Similarly, some projects may only partially address <br />certain criteria. When a proposed project does not address a particular criterion, the applicant should respond with <br />"Proposed project does not meet this criterion," or "Not Applicable." <br />Grant applicants should address this section of the application carefully and thoroughly, and should demonstrate to the <br />greatest extent possible how the proposed project relates to the DHPA's criteria. Staff recommendations will be prepared <br />based on the point scores earned through this exercise. Grants will not be made to any applicant scoring fewer than <br />60 points on the Administrative Priorities. Final authority on distribution of Indiana's grant funds rests with the <br />Indiana Historic Preservation Review Board. A copy of the Division's procedures for the grant selection process <br />is attached (Appendix B). <br />E. Proiect Budget <br />Complete the attached Project Budget form. Be sure to account for the total cost of the proposed project, not just the <br />federal share. Please complete each line, and insert "0" when the budget contains no costs for that particular line -item. <br />If grant funding is offered, reimbursements may only be made for costs incurred in the line -items that include these <br />original budget figures. The budget must be broken down as follows: <br />i. Personnel. This category refers only to persons on the regular payroll of the sponsoring organization. Persons <br />employed on a contractual basis for the sole purpose of working on the grant -assisted project are accounted for in <br />the "Contractual" line -item in the Budget. <br />2. Frinee Benefits. Fringe benefits for paid personnel are an allowable cost. To facilitate the budget process, fringe <br />benefit expenses are often expressed as a percentage of the "Personnel" cost. <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.