May 1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1 divisions were available then.they.would be happy. .to use it,, otherwise they., would' get .as close - a possible to 'the original light patterns with, what is available. Mr. Duvall noted that the.staff'does not have an Anderson product catalog, however, he believes .the standard fora window that size would be.a nine light, tic-tac-toe pattern. There was some discussion' over the' size of the current windows and their muntin ,division. ..Mr. Talley asked if Mr. O'Brien had originally -planned on having the muntins.in his replacements. Mr. -------- - - ----- O'Brien stated that he had planned -ori it. Mr. Talley -moved to approve the .application .with the installation of muntins to .replicate the originals and that if a twelve muntin pattern is not available then it is recommended that the owners themselves should be able to replicate' a twelve pattern muntin do to Mrs. O'Brien' -s personal abilities and tallents._ Mrs.. Sporleder seconded the motion and asked, what type. -of muntin would be used. Mr. O'Brien stated that;•it would be the.snap in kind. The -motion passed unanimously. 3. 1998-0331-2 - 66401.Walnut - New house construction. Mr. Duvall presented the staff report and circulated photographs and drawings. He also noted that the owner, Mr. Harman, was present. Mrs. Sporleder asked for clarification of a photograph and asked, the size of the lot proposed for the new construction. Mr. Duvall stated that the lot. contains 16.8 acres. She asked Mr—Harman if he had future plans to subdivide- the 16 -acres. `Mr. Harman stated that he had no such plans and that do to power lines and railroad tracks it would-be difficult to.build on the back portion of'the lot. Mr. Oxian stated that when the house was landmarked it included a total of 22. acres to retain the houses farmstead feel. - He also stated that by.building the,house in the proposed location would not affect the landmark or its site. Mrs. Sporleder moved to, approve the application as submitted. Mr. Fine seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Mr. Oxian discussed, landmarking farm houses and surrounding acreage.- Mr. ,Harman stated that - he was onthe: agenda under Historic Landmarks. Mr. Oxian stated that the Historic Landmarks,' Committee was going to reoommend denial of Mr. Harmans !request -to remove his'property'from landmark.status. 4. 1998-0407 - 1610 East Wayne Street-- Window replacement & addition Mr. Duvall presented the staff report and circulated photographs. He also noted that the owner, Mrs. McGrew,*,was present. _Mrs. McGrew state'd'that she .,does have interior storm. windows, however, they are still very,drafty.. Mr.. Oxian stated that he would like to place the application in the'Standards and Maintenance Committee,- .because of the lack of details- submitted. Mrs. Sporleder suggested that the Commission approve the concept of. Mrs. McGrew -'s proposal and let the Committee work out the details to save'the owner time and money. Mr. Oxian stated that the Committee could not make a final decision.'on anything. Mrs. Sporleder stated that perhaps the owner does not want to spend the _extra time and money on gathering more details if there is a possibility that - the Commission will turn- the 'application down. Mr. Fine asked Mrs. McGrew if it.had been her intention to -see -if the Commission felt her proposal .was possible.. Mrs. McGrew stated that it''was her intention to.be present to share her thoughts on the. windows ,and* addition. She noted that the replacIement_windows would be the same size as the original with the same light divisions. Mrs..McGrew stated that the screen porch•would be enclosed --exactly as it .is now. ._ Mrs. McGrew's builder further elaborated that' the* enclosed porch would match the house in window. style and siding with noalterationto-. existing openings. He also discussed- .the second story addition as following the footprint of .the old screened in porch, also with the same siding -and windows as the hest of the house.' .There was some discussion over the window type and design. Mr., Fine stated that the, request is too conceptional and needs,to go to Committee to work out the remaining details. Mrs. Choitz noted 2