September 1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

take longer than the one year period of -the COA to be completed. Mr. Hauser concurred with this. 1995-0725: 1043 Riverside Drive - LHD-RD; Replacement of rear privacy fence. Mr. Duvall noted that the applicant was not present and that the submittal of the application and its details had been handled by the tenant, Mr. Tom Serczynski and that the sketch site plan from the survey data card was attached by staff as no site plan had been submitted. Mr. Oxian inquired about the portion of the application regarding garage repairs. Mr. Duvall responded that the owner had removed these items from the application in phone conversation, leaving only the fence item to be considered and that there" seemed to be a misunderstanding between the Owner/Applicant and his tenant who had submitted the application materials.Mr. Talley observed.that he believed the tenant to be the moving force in attempts to conform with district standards at this property. He then read the Staff report. In discussion, Mr. Duvall clarified that.previous alteration of the garage has rendered its historical integrity dubious. Mr. Talley moved for approval of the fence for the tenant per the Staff Report. Mr. Fine seconded the motion. Mrs. Choitz questioned how we could issue a COA to a person who did not own the property. Mr. Duvall clarified that the signatory on the application was the owner but that the tenant had filed the application and provided the details of the fence and that all process had been confirmed with the owner in telephone conversation. :Mr. Talley withdrew his motion and then restated it to move that the application be approved Der the Staff Report and that the Oroiect be monitored by Staff. Adrian Fine seconded the motion. The motion was passed unanimously. IV. Regular Business A. Approval of Minutes - July 17, 1995 Mrs. Sporleder noted a redundant verb form in item, IV.D.1 (be being). Mr. Oxian called for approval of the minutes as corrected. The minutes were unanimously approved as amended. B. Treasurer's Report iir. Wiener distributed a balance sheet indicating that at the six month point we are on budget for the year. Ile noted that due to the way we are billed from the county, he has not separated postage from telephone expenses. Mrs. Choitz moved to accept the Treasurer's Report. Firs. Hostetler seconded the motion. The Treasurer's Report was unanimously accepted. Mrs. Sporleder inquired about the status of the County Budget. Mr. Duvall reported that to his understanding by hearsay that the $3,500 operational budget and his own salary are still line items in the County Commissioner's budget. On checking with the Executive Secretary of the County Council Friday of the previous week, there had still been no Commissioner's budget submitted. Ed Talley reported that on August 9, Patty Godsey, Executive Secretary of the County Commissioners, had indicated to him that a loo salary increase for the Director was being put forward while the Operating Budget was to remain constant and that money for grants would be handled on a case by case basis. . C. Correspondence .Mr. Duvall reported.the following items received: 1) Notice from the County Council Budget Committee indicating August 29 as the date of the Public Hearing for the 1996 budget. 2) Invitation to IILFI Northern Regional Office to visit with Victor Hood and Dr. Larry McKee who have been contracted for feasibility study for the restoration and interpretation of the hardy 'Manuel Log House on Friday August 25, 5:00 p.m. page 2