My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
January 1993
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 1993
>
January 1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2019 5:09:02 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:07:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001420
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Following through with the HPC's Minimum Maintenance Standards added many <br />•hours of staff time over the course of the year as did the various legal <br />challenges that were posed to Historic District guidelines. Since even the <br />simplest application takes up to an hour of staff time to complete and the <br />majority of applications take up many more hours than that (consulting with <br />the owner/contractor, doing research, site visits, assembling materials and <br />reports, correspondence etc.), the addition of a new historic district -- <br />River Bend -- and the possibility of additional districts in the near <br />future make it increasingly imperative that the HPC find the means with <br />which to expand the staff. <br />Overall the overwhelming majority of COA, maintenance and legal matters <br />encountered last year have been brought to successful conclusions. The most <br />troublesome cases seem to be the result of owners being ignorant of our <br />procedures and/or an unwillingness on the part of a small minority to <br />comply voluntarily with regulations they do not agree with. <br />COMMISSION POLICY DECISIONS <br />Following is a synopsis of HPC policy decisions that were approved in 1992: <br />In February the HPC adopted an addendum to Landmark Standards ("Moving <br />Structures") that specified the criteria for allowing a designated building <br />to be moved to another site. This policy clearly delineates the rationale <br />required for such a move: the owner must demonstrate that the move is <br />•consistent- with the preservation of the historical and architectural <br />characteristics of the structure. <br />In March the HPC approved Demolition Standards to be applied to Local <br />Landmarks and structures within Local Historic Districts. Demolition of <br />structures is not encouraged but the policy provides guidance for a owner <br />that wishes to demonstrate that a building is no longer viable. The HPC <br />requires that an owner provide evidence that: 1. the structure is <br />uneconomical; 2. is in an advanced state of disrepair; 3. that appropriate <br />renovation is impractical and; 4. that the owner has investigated all <br />reasonable alternatives to demolition. <br />In April the HPC adopted a policy for the preservation of "original <br />landmarks and buildings." In brief, the policy states that the commission <br />shall require a structure to be maintained in the condition it was in when <br />designated; in effect, a structure's "originality" is considered to be that <br />state found at the time of designation. This however, does not stop the <br />commission from allowing an owner to return a structure to its original <br />form. <br />LOCAL HISTORIC LANDMARKS <br />The HPC successfully lobbied for the designation and protection by <br />ordinance of four (4) Local Historic Landmarks in the county and city and <br />approved one (1) Landmark by Resolution: <br />635 South Main Street -- The Studebaker Administration Building The Common <br />Council voted in March to approve the HPC's recommendation for the <br />designation of this important structure -- one of the last buildings of the <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.