Laserfiche WebLink
Also among the stipulations of the CLG agreement is that the HPC will <br />continue to update the Indiana Historic Sites and Structures Inventory (the <br />"Survey") to allow for easier identification of structures impacted by <br />0rojects using federal funds and to ensure that all changes to eligible <br />structures in connection with those projects are done in accordance with <br />the Secretary of the Interior's standards and guidelines. <br />As part of this responsibility, approximately half of the staff's time in <br />the first half of 1992 was taken up by completion of the last phase of the <br />update of the city Survey. This update was begun in 1986 and was conducted <br />in six phases, each lasting a year. The project was essentially the <br />resurvey of the entire city of South Bend in order to identify structures <br />that had become eligible within intervening years between surveys and to <br />determine structures that were no longer contributing because of <br />alterations of various kinds or that had become contributing by <br />restoration. <br />The second half of the year was similarly occupied by beginning the task of <br />assembling materials with which to publish the results of the Survey in <br />June of 1993. This project involved: <br />1. checking individual survey forms for over fifty-four hundred (5400) <br />sites for accuracy; <br />2. assembling maps for all square -mile quadrants and Nat=ional. Register and <br />local districts; <br />3. researching and updating historical data; <br />4. assembling survey and historical photos for publication; <br />5. writing and; <br />�6. assembling the publication in tandem with the printers. <br />The publication will be complete by the end of June, 1993; this will be an <br />extremely busy winter as we endeavor to complete this project. <br />These grant projects function more than just as a means of fulfilling the <br />HPC's legal responsibilities as a local historic preservation agency. <br />Without these projects the HPC would not have a staff -- the Director, the <br />only full-time employee of local government (the county), would have the <br />task of fulfilling all of the HPC's administrative and professional duties <br />alone. These grant projects must therefore remain as the staff's primary <br />focus in order that they are completed on time and in an manner acceptable <br />to the Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology -- the agency <br />responsible for monitoring and funding the projects. <br />DISTRICT AND LANDMARK ADMINISTRATION <br />The responsibility of administering Local Historic Districts and Landmarks <br />remained as the staff's second most time-consuming activity in 1992. The <br />HPC has taken on additional responsibilities over the last few years that <br />have added to the task -- especially the enforcement of Minimum Maintenance <br />Standards. In addition there have been several legal challenges to HPC <br />regulations. <br />The HPC issued forty-nine (49) Certificates of Appropriateness in 1992. <br />WT wenty-five certificates were approved by the commission; the remainder <br />were approved by the staff under the direction of the HPG (see attached <br />tables). <br />