My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 08-04-95
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
RM 08-04-95
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2012 3:43:06 PM
Creation date
10/8/2012 1:45:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting - August 4, 1995 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont.) <br />a. continued... <br />requested closing date. Additionally, this <br />is not an issue that the Commission has <br />control over. <br />The staff recommends Commission <br />acceptance of this proposal subject to the <br />following conditions: <br />Legal Review - <br />The Commission's attorney has been <br />unavailable and has not yet reviewed the <br />proposal. Acceptance of this proposal <br />should be subject to legal review and <br />recommendations. <br />Tract II - Price Escalation <br />The proposal states "The purchase price <br />[of Tract II] shall be determined as of the <br />date that the applicant delivers or mails its <br />4 notice of intent." This needs to be tied to <br />the actual date of closing. Acceptance of <br />this proposal should be subject to <br />addressing this issue. <br />Faithful Performance Guaranty <br />The proposal includes a 10% performance <br />guaranty for the purchase and development <br />of Tract I only. Acceptance of this <br />proposal should be subject to receipt of an <br />acceptable performance guaranty for the <br />purchase and development of Tract II. <br />Building Design <br />The proposal did not include building <br />designs for either Phase I or Phase II. <br />Acceptance of this proposal should be tied <br />to final staff review of building design and <br />materials. The project is required to be <br />reviewed by the Corporate Park's <br />Architectural and Site Plan Review <br />Committee. <br />Hl- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.