My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 10-23-87
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
RM 10-23-87
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 2:57:35 PM
Creation date
10/4/2012 9:45:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend edevelopment Commission <br />Regular Mee ing - October 23, 1987 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont.) <br />c. conriinuea... <br />Mrs Kolata read into the record the <br />Evi ence of Blight. <br />Com- nission today has reviewed <br />ence of blight and finds the <br />continues to be blighted and <br />ht is found in the area based on <br />following facts: <br />e Commission finds that the Area <br />signated as the Rum Village <br />dustrial Park continues to be <br />ighted due to the continued <br />istence of the unstable soil <br />nditions which was the original <br />ighting condition. The high cost <br />removing and replacing the <br />stable soil has been a deterrent <br />private business operations that <br />nnot be overcome by the normal <br />velopment process. <br />Mr. Nimtz asked if there was any <br />objection to this evidence being receeved <br />into the record. There was none and the <br />evidence was received into the record. <br />Mr. imtz asked if there was anyone who <br />desi ed to be heard concerning Resolution <br />No. 17. No one appeared to be heard. <br />Mr. imtz concluded the Public Hearing <br />for ahatever action the Commission <br />desired to take. <br />d. Co ssion approval requested for <br />Reso ution No. 817. <br />Mr. Diasecki asked why the original <br />declaration of blight for the Rum Village <br />Industrial Park is not sufficient. Mrs. <br />Kola responded that the declaration of <br />blig t is the same, but the resolution is <br />chan ed in its provision for collection <br />of iricrement from personal property <br />taxes. Anytime a change is made in the <br />resolution or the plan for the <br />-13- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.