RM 09-25-81 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

South Bend Redevelopment Commission Rescheduledl Regular Meeting - September 25, 1981 6. NEW BUSINESS continued m. continued... Mr. McMahon stated that because the City is involved in paying for a portion ofthe project, we feel that it's in the best interest that it be independent. We wish to make it clear that there is no conflict of interest over a financial interest in the project ver us our requirements and regulatory functions. Ms. Qerbeckstated that if they did find problems, tha would mean a whole lot of new construction and tha would be kind of late. Mr. McMahon stated that he would hope that they wou dn't come up with anything startling. Mr. Nimtz stated that this is why we have lawyers to sue architects. Mr. Butler stated that normally the motion would be to approve subject to Council's review and approval. He uggested, though, that in this case the Commis- sioi direct that a contract be prepared, because this letter is not adequate. It does not spell out the Sco e of Services. Mr. McMahon stated that he understands that we are goi g to have sufficient authorization so they can get moving with that part to be resolved. Mr. Butler stated that the deficiencies.here are bas cally Scope of Services and not -to- exceed, which wou d put that $5,000.00 not -to- exceed'. The time with- in which their services would be performed. In con- cept the activities by Rolf Jensen & Associates, Inc. and directing the staff to prepare an appropriate agr ement then authorize the President and Secretary to txecute. On a motion made by Mr. Robinson, seconded by..L,1s. Auburn and unanimously carried, the Commission Presi- dent and Secretary were authorized to execute an agree- ment with Rolf Jensen & Associates, Inc., following preparation and review of an appropriate agreement by taff and legal counsel. n. Cotission approval Cle rance Contract jested for House Moving and and 16