My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 03-20-81
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
RM 03-20-81
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 4:05:24 PM
Creation date
9/26/2012 12:26:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Me ting - March 20, 1981 <br />5. PUBLICIHEARING (continued) <br />months months after that in acquiring that. It doesn't <br />come that fast. Just like Mr. McMahon indicated, you <br />don't now what is going to come down the pipe line as <br />far as the new administration is concerned. We are all <br />sitting here talking hypothetically, but nobody really <br />knows what is going to happen. <br />Mr. Ci a asked Mr. West if nothing happens, is he happy <br />with his business today. <br />Mr. We t responded that he was happy the way it stands <br />today. <br />Mr. Ni tz said that Substandard is getting rid of those <br />houses year by year. This is one of the situations that <br />is going on. A house deteriorates, the Substandard Depart- <br />ment gives a notice, nothing is done and down comes the <br />house. That is why you have vacant lots there. This is <br />going o continue unless something.is done. You are going <br />to con inue losing customers gradually. <br />Mr. We ;t said he isn't asking that the Commission do nothing, <br />he is sking that they be fair in what they do. <br />Mr. Ci a asked Mr. West what he is requesting the Commis- <br />sion to do today. <br />Mr. West replied that he was asking the Commission to <br />hold u on the resolution until such time that everyone <br />in that area is satisfied. <br />Mr. Ci a told Mr. West that the Commission was not going <br />to hurt him today. <br />Mr. We t replied today, tomorrow, next week, a month, you <br />are to king about demolition to start next month. <br />Mr. Butler suggested that if the Commission were to hold up <br />action on that property, we would very likely have to begin <br />the pr cess all over. We cannot add a property to the <br />acquisition list at this point in time, we can delete, but <br />we cannot add. We would have to cancel what has been done <br />to this point and start the process all over again. In <br />effect, we would need a resolution terminating and re- <br />scinding the prior resolution. Whether we would consider <br />adding that property today or next week, next month, or six <br />months from now, we could not do it through the vehicle of <br />this r solution, not with this plan. We would have to in- <br />stitut a new plan. <br />26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.