Laserfiche WebLink
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Me ting - March 20, 1981 <br />5. PUBLICIHEARING (continued) <br />Mr. Wet asked how many homes of the seventy -four that <br />the Co mission was going to take had families in them. <br />Mr. Mc ahon asked Mrs. Kolata if she could give an <br />es ima ed number. Mrs. Kolata said that she could not <br />off ha d and would have to look through the files <br />Mr. McMahon said that based on our conversation, he is <br />asking the Commission to take the action today with the <br />understanding that the green area, where the bulk of the <br />houses are located, is not up before the Commission and <br />won't be until April. A decision on whether to do some- <br />thing with Max's Grocery from an acquisition standpoint <br />could be included at the same time that a decision is <br />made with respect to the bulk of the housing that is <br />down in that area. <br />Second y, it will give the Commission an opportunity to <br />review the appropriateness of that type of action. Right <br />now we feel that a neighborhood grocery store is necessary <br />in the neighborhood. We feel that the market in the future <br />for a rocery store will be better and greater in that area, <br />if we re successful than it is today. Right now it is <br />also a fact that what we are proposing in that area which <br />is a " Residential zoning is compatible with having a <br />grocert store there. The grocery store is consistent with <br />our pl n -and is exactly the kind of facility we would like <br />to see there. The whole question is coming down to the <br />situation of a small grocery store, and I don't believe <br />that M% McKnight or Mr. West would disagree with my state- <br />ment tat they will probably have a better market in the <br />future or a good chance of it, and there is not a bad <br />market there now. The whole question is coming down to <br />that p int in time that there may be some disruptions in <br />their ibility to survive during that period of time which <br />we ack owledge is a difficult situation. But in light of <br />the fa :t that we do not need the property for any action <br />and th use of the existing property is consistent with <br />what i proposed for the neighborhood, I think that the <br />Commis ion has to look at this and talk with [IUD and make <br />certaii that we are not into a non - compliance situation. <br />That i3 the basis for our staff recommendation. That ,you <br />would nove with the plan at this time and take a look at <br />how to handle Max's Grocery store at the time of the bulk <br />of the housing decision would be made, which is sometime <br />in the first part of April. <br />24 <br />