My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 09-16-77
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1977
>
RM 09-16-77
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 5:11:54 PM
Creation date
9/24/2012 1:08:20 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7. FLOORIDISCUSSION (CONT'D <br />Mr. K ine asked a question about money that was put down by Associates in the <br />previous Superblock proposal... "and then you don't hear of whether it was <br />ever returned ... this leaves me with the impression that something is covered up. <br />Is th -s going to be the same situation here, are they going to be bound to <br />put d llars in and be legally bound, if they do not go through with this project, <br />because the economy changes, what happens then, do these people lose their money <br />or wi 1 it be given back? Is there a guarantee involved ?" Mr. Nimtz said <br />this las been explained several times before and here again, with definite <br />regulations from HUD as to what we can do and what we con't do, when federal <br />money is taken you take the federal regulations along with it. They tell you <br />what 3ou can do and what you cannot do. Mr. Butler explained further the <br />proce ure on bidding for disposition property is the Commission at a planned <br />time vhen the property in question is acquired, if the Commission decides that <br />it wi 1 proceed, then following that determination, the Commission can offer <br />the p operty for sale. With that offer then a notice will be made in the paper, <br />bids will be received on a specified date, and with the bids, a 10% bid bond <br />is re uired. Assuming that the various bids or bid received are in order <br />they will be reviewed, and a determination made by the Commission to accept <br />one of the bids, or bid or reject the bid or bids, then a schedule will be <br />established at that point where the execution of a redevelopment contract <br />and a ain, a performance bond is required, once the contract itself is <br />execu ed. Prior to the execution of the contract if the party to whom the bid <br />has been awarded, fails to enter into the contract or in some other way defaults, <br />then the 10% bid bond would be retained by the Commission. The same is true <br />after the contract has been entered into .... both the bid bond and the <br />perfo Zumum nce bond will be retained. There is a minimum bid required, and <br />that usually is set by the appraisal value of the property. <br />Mr. A <br />he ha <br />propo <br />after <br />made <br />of th <br />said <br />Counc <br />commi <br />Mr. B <br />I hea <br />"now <br />Nimtz <br />conti <br />"a de <br />part <br />meeti <br />clear <br />Mr. A <br />Mr. A <br />Mr. N <br />has t <br />have <br />canno <br />at th <br />derson questioned Mr. Brownell about his telling the Common Council that <br />a commitment for the developmentâMr. Brownell indicated that he said <br />al ... Mr. Anderson asked if he had a commitment to bid on the property <br />it has been acquired... Mr. Butler answered "No, we do not, we have <br />his clear, we cannot legally take a commitment until we have possession <br />property. Are you saying a legally binding commitment ?" Mr. Anderson <br />"Yes, if I recall the remarks at the Common Council meeting the Common <br />1 was told at the time of the approval of the R -66 proposal that definite <br />ments had been obtained by the proposed developers to bid on the property." <br />tler added that" I was at the meeting and Mr. Brownell did not say nor did <br />that and if he had I would have immediately..." Mr. Anderson interrupted <br />it may have been ducked like some of the questions have been today..." Mr. <br />commented "Now Dick do not say that..." "But there was ... Mr. Anderson <br />rued..." a statement that the proposed developers..." Mr. Butler interrupted, <br />finite statement was made today to you that no binding commitment on the <br />of the developers has been made, and that same statement was made at the <br />g in August when the Commission received the proposal. We stated very <br />y that it was just a proposal...a letter of interest...a letter of intent." <br />derson asked "that is not binding..." Mr. Nimtz added "it cannot be..." <br />derson added that "I hope you make that clear to the Common Council..." <br />imtz added, "Dick, I think where you are confused is that the developer <br />e commitment from his proposed tenants... but Mr. Brownell and Mr. Butler <br />teen with this Commission a long time and they both know that legally we <br />take any money down, or enter into any agreement with these people... <br />Is time." Mr. Anderson asked if their proposal to bid, does it include <br />(12) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.