My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 09-16-77
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1977
>
RM 09-16-77
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 5:11:54 PM
Creation date
9/24/2012 1:08:20 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7. FLOORIDISCUSSION (CONT'D <br />Mr. Alderson continued... "all of the property involved in R -66 for the <br />Centu y Mall project ?" Mr. Butler stated "it includes the property bounded <br />by Wa hington on the north, the service drive, just east of main street, the <br />weste n boundary, the southern boundary of Jefferson Street, the eastern <br />bound ry of St. Joseph Street, and it excludes the parking garage and the <br />Sherl nd Building." "Does it include or exclude the Odd Fellows Building ?" <br />asked Mr. Anderson. "It excludes it..." Mr. Butler continued... "the area <br />that they are proposing to bid upon in their proposal did refer to a parking <br />area between the service drive and Main Street which would include the <br />Odd Fellows Building, but it is not within their project. Mr. Anderson <br />added "then therefore, the Redevelopment has included Odd Fellows in R -66 for <br />purpo es known only to the Redevelopment Commission and the City of South Bend." <br />"I th nk that was discussed," stated Mr. Butler, "both at the Commission <br />meeti g when Resolution 540 was adopted and also the hearing before the Common <br />Counc 1." Mr. Anderson clarified, "If I understand what you are saying... <br />the 1 nd and building known as the Odd Fellows building will be no part of <br />the C ntury Mall which is the purpose of amending R -66 in the first place... <br />the Odd Fellows building and its property will be involved solely in acquisition <br />for purposes of the City of South Bend to avoid going through a specific con- <br />demnation of the property by the City of South Bend in which event they could <br />not prevail ... in other words Redevelopment would acquire this property..." <br />Mr. Butler answered the question simply no that is not correct. Mr. Anderson <br />added "well then what is the purpose of the Redevelopment Commission acquiring <br />the Odd Fellows building ?" Mr. Butler stated it is "added as a part of the <br />overa 1 approach in the downtown area by the Redevelopment Department in Indiana <br />R -66 Mr. Anderson stated "it is not then the intent of the City to take that <br />property and build a garage ?" Mr. Butler: "At this point I think that this <br />is the understanding or intent. It has not been finalized by the Commission." <br />"So, " said Mr. Anderson, "that the only purpose of the R -66 Project including <br />the Odd Fellows building at this moment is for the purpose of the City of <br />South Bend to build a parking garage on that property." Mr. Butler reiterated: <br />"It i the concept at this time to include a parking garage on that property and <br />all of the property between Main Street and Jefferson." Mr. Anderson concluded " <br />and ten that is the only purpose of the Odd Fellows building ? "... Mr. Butler <br />repli d that was the correct concept. <br />Mr. D naldson asked that the gentleman speaking identify himself. Mr. Nimtz <br />identified him as Mr. Joseph Dick Anderson, a respected attorney, one of the <br />entre reneuers concerned with the purchase of the Odd Fellows building. <br />Mrs. Illen was recognized by Mr. Nimtz: "Do we now have to remonstrate to the <br />City f South Bend in regards to the Odd Fellows Building ?" Mr. Nimtz replied <br />that ro this was still a part of the redevelopment project, and resolution, and <br />that ihe public hearing on October 7, 1977 at 10:00 a.m. is the proper place to <br />remonstrate. <br />Mr. K ine asked of <br />Build ng, the Wyman <br />purpose of possible <br />yes, t is for the <br />futuri development. <br />the commission if the reason for the acquisition of the Oliver <br />property, and the old American Bank Building was for the <br />further expansion of this development... Mr. Brownell said <br />development of the downtown, the future to provide for the <br />(13) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.