Laserfiche WebLink
6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont'd <br />0 <br />e. <br />in the $4 -1/2 Million and this saves considerable interest on daily, <br />weekly and monthly basis. Mr. Brownell stated that in the last two <br />years, we have reduced these Notes approximately $6 Million; they <br />were $10,381,000 last year. <br />The Chair asked the Commissioners if they had any questions on <br />the Notes; then asked the public if they had any questions they <br />may want to ask on this financing; there being none, he requested <br />a motion to confirm the bid award to the low bidder as tabulated <br />above. <br />Mr. Wiggins made the motion the bid award is accepted and confirmed <br />to the low bidder, Bankers Trust Company, in bid amount of $4,221,000 <br />with interest rate of 2.94% and premium of $143.00. <br />Addendum No. 6 to the A reement for Engineering Services with Cole <br />ADDENDUM <br />Associates, R -57: Mr. Brownell explained that under Addendum No. 5 <br />6 TO <br />to the Agreement for Engineering Services with Cole Associates, <br />AGREEMENT <br />the Addendum provided for the payment to the engineer for the pro- <br />WITH COLE <br />perty surveys to be increased from $35.00 to $50.00 per plotted lot. <br />ASSOCIATES <br />Last May, Mr. William J. Parrish requested 124 legal descriptions <br />APPROVED, <br />be forwarded to our office. Since Addendum No. 5 does not cover a <br />R -57 <br />price for the preparation of descriptions only, the cost of $50.00 <br />per parcel is too high for this service. Therefore, the request <br />is made that the Agreement be amended once again to provide for <br />payment to the Engineer for property surveys on the basis of the <br />actual hours required to make the survey and prepare the plat of <br />survey. <br />Mr. Brownell explained that under the $50.00 price, it would cost <br />$6,200 for these, and under this proposed Addendum No. 6, it will <br />:ost around $1,600 which is their actual time - -their time being <br />2-1/2 multiplier that is used. So we thoroughly recommend the <br />iddendum for Commission consideration. <br />. Wiggins made the motion for the approval of Addendum No. 6, <br />conded by Mr. Cira. <br />he Chair asked if there were any further questions or further <br />iscussions on this item, and Commissioner Wiggins asked Mr. <br />rownell if this will wind it up in the LaSalle Park Project? <br />r. Brownell said that it will pretty much; of course, we have <br />o have these on all the parcels that we have acquired and have <br />of sold, but if we acquire some more, we would have to have a <br />ew more but not very many. <br />he question on the adoption of the motion was unanimous in <br />avor of the adoption and the motion was carried. <br />tesolution No. 529: This Resolution authorizes the execution RESOLUTION <br />)f the Redevelopment Agreement for the disposition of land and NO. 529 <br />;he execution of Quit -Claim Deed for the transfer of title thereto ADOPTED, <br />n connection with land to be disposed of in the LaSalle Park R -57 <br />